Evaluation of the costs and outcomes from changes in risk factors in type 2 diabetes using the Cardiff stochastic simulation cost-utility model (DiabForecaster)
- PMID: 16393438
- DOI: 10.1185/030079906X80350
Evaluation of the costs and outcomes from changes in risk factors in type 2 diabetes using the Cardiff stochastic simulation cost-utility model (DiabForecaster)
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the mean costs and outcomes associated with modifiable risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and to determine equivalent changes to these risk factors in terms of financial costs and health outcomes.
Methods: The Cardiff Stochastic Simulation Cost-Utility Model (DiabForecaster), which evolved from the Eastman model, was used to follow a cohort of 10 000 patients over 20 years.
Results: Costs were affected most significantly by changes in the total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (Total-C:HDL-C) ratio and in HbA(1c). Unit increases in Total-C:HDL-C increased discounted costs by pound 200 per patient; for ratios > 8 units, unit increases led to cost increases of pound 300 per patient. Unit increases in HbA(1c) increased per patient discounted costs from pound 200 (5-6%) up to pound 2900 (10-11%). Similar patterns were observed for QALYs. Estimates of equivalence showed that a 1% reduction in HbA(1c) was equivalent to an 0.4 increment in QALYs, which was equivalent to a reduction of 44 mmHg in SBP, 18.2 mg/dL in HDL, 100 mg/dL in total cholesterol or 1.8 units of Total-C:HDL-C ratio. A 1% reduction in HbA(1c) was also equivalent to pound 108 less cost, which was equivalent to a 13.0 mmHg decrease in SBP or a 0.57 unit decrease in the Total-C:HDL-C ratio.
Conclusions: This model provides reliable utility estimates for diabetic complications and may eliminate uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analyses of treatment. These data also provide a novel way of comparing the value of treatments that have multiple effects.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart in poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in China.Adv Ther. 2008 Aug;25(8):752-74. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0080-4. Adv Ther. 2008. PMID: 18704282
-
A health economic analysis of screening and optimal treatment of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in the USA.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Apr;23(4):1216-23. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn082. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008. PMID: 18359872 Clinical Trial.
-
Model-based simulation to explore the cost-effectiveness of following practice guidelines for triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control among patients with diabetes mellitus and mixed dyslipidemia.Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):862-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.015. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19446159
-
Impact of rosuvastatin use on costs and outcomes in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease in US managed care and medicare populations: A data analysis.Clin Ther. 2006 Sep;28(9):1425-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.09.019. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 17062315
-
Diabetes in Japan: a review of disease burden and approaches to treatment.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009 Nov;25(8):705-16. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1012. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009. PMID: 19795421 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Spain: results of the DECLARE-TIMI 58 study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07567-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35177053 Free PMC article.
-
Uncontrolled diabetes and health care utilisation: panel data evidence from Spain.Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):785-795. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0920-8. Epub 2017 Aug 10. Eur J Health Econ. 2018. PMID: 28799036
-
Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Economic Reviews: Tailoring Methods to Ensure Utility of Findings.Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6S2):S155-S163. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.012. Am J Prev Med. 2017. PMID: 29153116 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Michigan Model for Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Validation.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Oct;17(10):701-11. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0304. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015. PMID: 26222704 Free PMC article.
-
The long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus sitagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in China.Health Econ Rev. 2024 Apr 2;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00499-2. Health Econ Rev. 2024. PMID: 38564113 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous