Validity of anogenital distance as a marker of in utero phthalate exposure
- PMID: 16393642
- PMCID: PMC1332693
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.114-1332693
Validity of anogenital distance as a marker of in utero phthalate exposure
Comment in
-
Anogenital distance: defining "normal".Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jul;114(7):A399; author reply A399. doi: 10.1289/ehp.114-a399a. Environ Health Perspect. 2006. PMID: 16835039 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure.Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1056-61. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8100. Environ Health Perspect. 2005. PMID: 16079079 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gray LE, Ostby J, Furr J, Wolf CJ, Lambright C, Parks L, et al. Effects of environmental antiandrogens on reproductive development in experimental animals. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:248–264. - PubMed
-
- Nagao T, Ohta R, Marumo H, Shindo T, Yoshimura S, Ono H. Effect of butyl benzyl phthalate in Sprague-Dawley rats after gavage administration: a two-generation reproductive study. Reprod Toxicol. 2000;14:513–532. - PubMed
-
- Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-food Products 2002. Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-food Products Intended for Consumers Concerning Diethyl Phthalate. SCCNFGP/ 0411/01, Final. Available: http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/sccp/documents/out16... [accessed 7 December 2005].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources