Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006;20(1):51-66.
doi: 10.2165/00023210-200620010-00005.

Prescription privileges for psychologists: a comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies

Affiliations
Review

Prescription privileges for psychologists: a comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies

Kim L Lavoie et al. CNS Drugs. 2006.

Abstract

The debate over whether clinical psychologists should be granted the right to prescribe psychoactive medications has received considerable attention over the past 2 decades in North America and, more recently, in the UK. Proponents of granting prescription privileges to clinical psychologists argue that mental healthcare services are in crisis and that the mental health needs of society are not being met. They attribute this crisis primarily to the inappropriate prescribing practices of general practitioners and a persistent shortage of psychiatrists. It is believed that, as they would increase the scope of the practice of psychology, prescription privileges for psychologists would enhance mental health services by increasing public access to qualified professionals who are able to prescribe. The profession of psychology remains divided on the issue, and opponents have been equally outspoken in their arguments. The purpose of the present article is to place the pursuit of prescription privileges for psychologists in context by discussing the historical antecedents and major forces driving the debate. The major arguments put forth for and against prescription privileges for psychologists are presented, followed by a critical analysis of the validity and coherence of those arguments. Through this analysis, the following question is addressed. Is there currently sufficient empirical support for the desirability, feasibility, safety and cost effectiveness of granting prescription privileges to psychologists? Although proponents of granting prescription privileges to psychologists present several compelling arguments in favour of this practice, there remains a consistent lack of empirical evidence for the desirability, feasibility, safety and cost effectiveness of this proposal. More research is needed before we can conclude that prescription privileges for psychologists are a safe and logical solution to the problems facing the mental healthcare system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Public Health Policy. 1991 Winter;12(4):510-24 - PubMed
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;70(3):590-610 - PubMed
    1. Am Psychol. 1946 Jun;1(6):181-9 - PubMed
    1. Am Psychol. 1996 Mar;51(3):225-9 - PubMed
    1. Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Dec;55(12):1420-6 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources