Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan 5:7:1.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-1.

The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: a cross-sectional survey

Affiliations

The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: a cross-sectional survey

Benjamin Littenberg et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Adherence with medication taking is a major barrier to physiologic control in diabetes and many strategies for improving adherence are in use. We sought to describe the use of mnemonic devices and other adherence aids by adults with diabetes and to investigate their association with control of hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and hypertension.

Methods: Cross sectional survey of diabetic adults randomly selected from Primary Care practices in the Vermont Diabetes Information System. We used linear regression to examine the associations between the use of various aids and physiologic control among subjects who used oral agents for hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.

Results: 289 subjects (mean age 65.4 years; 51% female) used medications for all three conditions. Adherence aids were reported by 80%. The most popular were day-of-the-week pill boxes (50%), putting the pills in a special place (41%), and associating pill taking with a daily event such as a meal, TV show, or bedtime (11%). After adjusting for age, sex, marital status, income, and education, those who used a special place had better glycemic control (A1C -0.36%; P = .04) and systolic blood pressure (-5.9 mm Hg; P = .05) than those who used no aids. Those who used a daily event had better A1C (-0.56%; P = .01) than patients who used no aids.

Conclusion: Although adherence aids are in common use among adults with diabetes, there is little evidence that they are efficacious. In this study, we found a few statistically significant associations with adherence aids and better diabetes control. However, these findings could be attributed to multiple comparisons or unmeasured confounders. Until more rigorous evaluations are available, it seems reasonable to recommend keeping medicines in a special place for diabetic adults prescribed multiple medications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Watkins JD, Roberts DE, Williams TF, Martin DA, Coyle IV. Observation of medication errors made by diabetic patients in the home. Diabetes. 1967;16:882–5.
    1. Cerkoney AB, Hart K. The relationship between the health belief model and compliance of persons with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1980;3:594–8. - PubMed
    1. Cramer JA, Spilker B. Patient Compliance in Medical Practice and Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press; 1991.
    1. Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. Compliance in Health Care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.
    1. Schectman JM, Bovbjerg VE, Voss JD. Predictors of medication-refill adherence in an indigent rural population. Med Care. 2002;40:1294–300. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200212000-00016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms