Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement
- PMID: 16397743
- DOI: 10.1007/s11095-005-9045-3
Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement
Abstract
Despite major advances in modern drug discovery and development, the number of new drug approvals has not kept pace with the increased cost of their development. Increasingly, innovative uses of biomarkers are employed in an attempt to speed new drugs to market. Still, widespread adoption of biomarkers is impeded by limited experience interpreting biomarker data and an unclear regulatory climate. Key differences preclude the direct application of existing validation paradigms for drug analysis to biomarker research. Following the AAPS 2003 Biomarker Workshop (J. W. Lee, R. S. Weiner, J. M. Sailstad, et al. Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development. A conference report. Pharm Res 22:499-511, 2005), these and other critical issues were addressed. A practical, iterative, "fit-for-purpose" approach to biomarker method development and validation is proposed, keeping in mind the intended use of the data and the attendant regulatory requirements associated with that use. Sample analysis within this context of fit-for-purpose method development and validation are well suited for successful biomarker implementation, allowing increased use of biomarkers in drug development.
Similar articles
-
Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development: a conference report.Pharm Res. 2005 Apr;22(4):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-2495-9. Epub 2005 Apr 7. Pharm Res. 2005. PMID: 15846456
-
Biomarker assay translation from discovery to clinical studies in cancer drug development: quantification of emerging protein biomarkers.Adv Cancer Res. 2007;96:269-98. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(06)96010-2. Adv Cancer Res. 2007. PMID: 17161683 Review.
-
Fit-for-purpose biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.Drug Discov Today. 2010 Oct;15(19-20):816-25. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Aug 11. Drug Discov Today. 2010. PMID: 20708097 Review.
-
Clinical biomarker validation.Bioanalysis. 2018 Jun 1;10(12):957-968. doi: 10.4155/bio-2018-0061. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Bioanalysis. 2018. PMID: 29923754 Review.
-
Evolution of fit-for-purpose biomarker validations: an LBA perspective.Bioanalysis. 2018 Jun 1;10(12):905-907. doi: 10.4155/bio-2017-0267. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Bioanalysis. 2018. PMID: 29923756
Cited by
-
Development of blood biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury: an evaluation of their potential for risk assessment and diagnostics.Mol Diagn Ther. 2013 Dec;17(6):343-54. doi: 10.1007/s40291-013-0049-0. Mol Diagn Ther. 2013. PMID: 23868512 Review.
-
Claudin-2 Expression Levels in Ulcerative Colitis: Development and Validation of an In-Situ Hybridisation Assay for Therapeutic Studies.PLoS One. 2016 Sep 6;11(9):e0162076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162076. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27598247 Free PMC article.
-
Calculations for Adjusting Endogenous Biomarker Levels During Analytical Recovery Assessments for Ligand-Binding Assay Bioanalytical Method Validation.AAPS J. 2015 Jul;17(4):939-47. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9756-2. Epub 2015 Apr 23. AAPS J. 2015. PMID: 25903932 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of Electrochemiluminescence Assays to Measure Free and Total sSLAMF7 in Human Serum in the Absence and Presence of Elotuzumab.AAPS J. 2016 Jul;18(4):989-99. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9912-3. Epub 2016 Apr 26. AAPS J. 2016. PMID: 27116021
-
Research at the interface of industry, academia and regulatory science.Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):432-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt0510-432. Nat Biotechnol. 2010. PMID: 20458309 No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources