Oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home before surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 16398773
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00798.x
Oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home before surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare the impact of 400 mug oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home on pre-operative cervical priming in both primigravid and multigravid women prior to first trimester surgical abortion.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Norwegian University Teaching Hospital.
Sample: Three hundred and thirty-eight women undergoing surgical abortion between 7 and 12 weeks of gestation.
Methods: The women were randomised to either 400 microg of oral misoprostol the evening before or 400-microg of self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home the same day as vacuum aspiration. Main outcome measures Pre-operative cervical dilatation, complications and acceptability.
Results: The median cervical dilatation was 6.2 mm (range 0-11 mm) for the women in the 400 mug oral misoprostol and 6.5 mm (range 0-11 mm) in the 400-microg vaginal misoprostol groups. The median pre-operative dilatation was larger in multigravidae (6.4 and 6.7 mm for the oral and vaginal routes, respectively) than in primigravidae (5.8 and 6.0 mm, respectively). In primigravidae, 19% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm, with no significant difference between oral and vaginal dosage. In multigravidae, 52% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm with vaginal dosage, compared with 36% with oral dosage (P = 0.03). There was no difference between non-immigrant versus immigrant women in pre-operative cervical dilatation. The 400-microg oral dosage group had a higher risk of bleeding, compared with the group receiving 400-microg vaginal misoprostol [odds ratio (OR) = 10.4; confidence interval (CI) 5.2-20.8]. There was no difference between non-immigrant and immigrant women in acceptability of self-administered vaginal misoprostol; almost all women found this administration route acceptable. Complications were minor and were distributed equally between the two dosage groups.
Conclusions: The vaginal route will result in a satisfactory dilatation in about half of multigravidae but is much less effective in primigravidae. The oral route does not lead to satisfactory dilatation in either group and is associated with a higher occurrence of pre-operative bleeding. Self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home is highly acceptable.
Comment in
-
Oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home before surgical termination of pregnancy by Oppegaard et al.BJOG. 2006 Aug;113(8):979-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00961.x. BJOG. 2006. PMID: 16907951 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomised controlled study comparing oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to surgical termination of pregnancy.BJOG. 2003 Dec;110(12):1057-61. BJOG. 2003. PMID: 14664876 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of oral misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: a randomised controlled trial of 400 versus 200 microg in first trimester pregnancies.BJOG. 2004 Feb;111(2):154-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00045.x. BJOG. 2004. PMID: 14723753 Clinical Trial.
-
Oral versus vaginal misoprostol administered one hour before surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):456-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00255.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 15777444 Clinical Trial.
-
Cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy: is the application of misoprostol useful?Minerva Ginecol. 2011 Oct;63(5):439-48. Minerva Ginecol. 2011. PMID: 21926953 Review.
-
The use of prostaglandins and their analogues for abortion.Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):573-84. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984. PMID: 6391777 Review.
Cited by
-
A combination of misoprostol and estradiol for preoperative cervical ripening in postmenopausal women: a randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):53-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02435.x. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20002369 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical