doi: 10.1126/science.1122796.
Research funding: peer review at NIH
Affiliations
- PMID: 16400135
- DOI: 10.1126/science.1122796
Item in Clipboard
Research funding: peer review at NIH
Science.
.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
Grants, politics, and the NIH.N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2259-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe038192. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 14657434 No abstract available.
-
A metareview at the NIH.Nat Med. 2008 Apr;14(4):351. doi: 10.1038/nm0408-351. Nat Med. 2008. PMID: 18391922
-
Commentary: new guidelines for NIH peer review: improving the system or undermining it?Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):746-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d7e130. Acad Med. 2010. PMID: 20520019
-
NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Mar;33(3):15-6. doi: 10.1038/laban0304-15. Lab Anim (NY). 2004. PMID: 15235618 Review. No abstract available.
-
Making the case for NIH funding: how cures are built on decades of research.Physiologist. 2006 Dec;49(6):313, 319-21. Physiologist. 2006. PMID: 17175749 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0205929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205929. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30427864 Free PMC article.
-
Administrative Discretion in Scientific Funding: Evidence from a Prestigious Postdoctoral Training Program.Res Policy. 2020 May;49(4):103953. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103953. Epub 2020 Mar 14. Res Policy. 2020. PMID: 32675837 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.PLoS One. 2007 Mar 28;2(3):e332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000332. PLoS One. 2007. PMID: 17389922 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
