The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision
- PMID: 16400512
- DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0186-6
The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision
Abstract
Purpose: A positive circumferential resection margin is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The mesorectum is thinner anteriorly than posteriorly, and the risk of a positive resection margin may be higher for anterior than for posterior tumors. We sought to determine the effect of the tumor's position in the circumference of the rectum on the treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated by total mesorectal excision.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 401 patients with rectal cancer staged by preoperative endorectal ultrasound and treated by sharp mesorectal excision with or without neoadjuvant therapy. Tumors were classified into four groups (anterior, posterior, lateral, and circumferential) according to the location of deepest point of penetration on endorectal ultrasound. Differences in recurrence and survival rates were analyzed with logistic regression analysis.
Results: Of the 401 tumors, 27 percent were anterior, 26 percent posterior, 32 percent lateral, and 15 percent circumferential. The groups did not differ in age, gender, tumor distance from the anal verge, or tumor grade. The ultrasound and pathology stages were more advanced in the circumferential group, and the proportion of uT4 tumors was higher in the anterior group. Circumferential and anterior tumors were more likely to receive preoperative adjuvant radiation. After an average follow-up of 44 months, 20 percent of patients had developed recurrence (13 percent distant, 6 percent local, and 1 percent distant and local). Recurrence was associated with advanced tumor stage, tumor proximity to the anal verge, and no preoperative adjuvant therapy. Early tumor stage and preoperative chemoradiation were associated with lower recurrence and improved survival. When tumor stage was controlled for, patients with poor or undifferentiated tumors and male patients with anterior tumors were shown to have a higher risk of recurrence or death. The estimated five-year disease-free survival for the entire group was 73 percent.
Conclusions: Tumor stage is the main criterion to estimate prognosis in rectal cancer patients. The position of the tumor within the circumference of the rectum may provide valuable clinical information. Anterior tumors tend to be more advanced and, at least in male patients, has a higher risk of recurrence and death than tumors in other locations.
Similar articles
-
Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jan;47(1):48-58. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0012-y. Epub 2004 Jan 14. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004. PMID: 14719151
-
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18679748
-
Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.Ann Surg. 2007 Jul;246(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000259432.29056.9d. Ann Surg. 2007. PMID: 17592295 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Histologic response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal adenocarcinoma: own experience and review of the literature].Orv Hetil. 2006 Oct 22;147(42):2011-20. Orv Hetil. 2006. PMID: 17165600 Review. Hungarian.
-
Role of total mesorectal excision and of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival of patients with rectal carcinoma.Dig Dis. 2007;25(1):51-5. doi: 10.1159/000099170. Dig Dis. 2007. PMID: 17384508 Review.
Cited by
-
Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer.Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):384-411. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00388.0055. Epub 2024 Aug 30. Ann Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 39228201 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A New Approach to Ultra-Low Anterior Resection-Intersphincteric Dissection With Total Hiatal Ligament Excision for Very Low Rectal Cancer Located in the Posterior Wall of the Rectum: A More Satisfactory Technique for Local Recurrence Control.Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70307. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70307. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 39387535 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing downstaging after neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy in rectal carcinoma.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jun;37(6):1355-1365. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04174-y. Epub 2022 May 11. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 35545701 Free PMC article.
-
Tumor location as an indication for adjuvant radiotherapy in pT3N0 rectal cancer after surgery.Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 16;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1206-3. Radiat Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30651116 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of circumferential tumor location of mid to low rectal cancer on oncologic outcomes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Aug;103(2):87-95. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.2.87. Epub 2022 Aug 5. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022. PMID: 36017139 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources