[Prospective study of laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernia by means of the use of composite mesh: indications, complications, mesh fixation materials and results]
- PMID: 16400765
[Prospective study of laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernia by means of the use of composite mesh: indications, complications, mesh fixation materials and results]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish the indications, safety, efficacy, feasibility and reproducibility of laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of abdominal wall defects, even of the larger kind, in order to standardise procedures and confirm the performance of the composite mesh used (Parietex, Sofradim, Trevoux, France). From January 2001 to December 2004, 185 non-selected patients (109 females, 76 males), with a mean age of 56 years (range: 26-77) and a mean BMI of 30 (range: 26-40) were included in the study; 162 patients (87.5%) had incisional hernias and 23 patients (12.5%) primary wall defects. The size of the defects treated ranged from 4 cm to 26 cm (mean: 12.1 cm). All patients underwent laparoscopic repair and all meshes were placed intraperitoneally. Over a mean follow-up period of 29 months (range: 1-48), we observed 11 postoperative complications (6.7%): 7 seromas (4.3%) which were still present after 4 weeks, one of which turned septic after several attempts at percutaneous evacuation and in which the prosthesis had to be removed laparoscopically; 3 (1.8%) experienced persistent neuralgia which disappeared after 2 months' treatment with NSAIDs, and also one case of trocar-induced haematoma. We had 4 recurrences (2.4%), all within 1 to 3 months of surgery; 1 in the size group measuring less than 9 cm and 3 in the larger defect group. Adhesiolysis was performed in 98% of all incisional hernia cases and in 7 cases (4.3%) we had to repair iatrogenic lesions of the small bowel. In 4 patients (2.5%), because of thick adhesions (1 patient) or bowel loop fixation to the previous surgical scar (3 patients), we caused complete bowel perforation repaired by laparoscopic suture. Mean operative time was 65.6 minutes (range: 28-130) and the mean hospital stay was 2.1 days (range: 1-5). We had no conversions and no mortality. We also reviewed the main methods of mesh fixation and believe that the best system at the moment is the EndoAnchor (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio) device, although in future the best option is likely to be fixation with non-traumatic biological glue (Tissucol, Baxter, Maurepas), which we have already used in a series of 16 patients with optimal results and no recurrences. The results emerging from this clinical trial confirm the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repair techniques, of this kind of mesh and of the anchoring devices used as well as the reproducibility of this technique for the intraperitoneal repair of primary and incisional abdominal wall defects, including even those of large size.
Similar articles
-
Characterizing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.Can J Surg. 2007 Jun;50(3):195-201. Can J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17568491 Free PMC article.
-
Polyester-based mesh for ventral hernia repair: is it safe?Am J Surg. 2009 Mar;197(3):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.003. Am J Surg. 2009. PMID: 19245914
-
Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias.Am Surg. 2002 Jun;68(6):530-3; discussion 533-4. Am Surg. 2002. PMID: 12079134
-
[Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: our experience and review of the literature].Chir Ital. 2007 Sep-Oct;59(5):671-7. Chir Ital. 2007. PMID: 18019639 Review. Italian.
-
Laparoscopic spigelian hernia repair: the scroll technique.Am Surg. 2008 Feb;74(2):108-12. Am Surg. 2008. PMID: 18306858 Review.
Cited by
-
Combination of liechtenstein repair with herniorrhaphy in open inguinal hernia repair- a prospective observational single center study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):NC03-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10533.4926. Epub 2014 Oct 20. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014. PMID: 25478390 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Preperitoneal Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: an Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials.Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1258-69. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1271-2. Epub 2015 Apr 28. Indian J Surg. 2015. PMID: 27011548 Free PMC article.
-
Different methods of mesh fixation in open retromuscular incisional hernia repair: a comparative study in pigs.Hernia. 2010 Dec;14(6):623-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0725-5. Epub 2010 Sep 12. Hernia. 2010. PMID: 20835908
-
Comparison of polypropylene versus polyester mesh in the Lichtenstein hernia repair with respect to chronic pain and discomfort.Hernia. 2011 Dec;15(6):643-54. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0841-x. Epub 2011 Jul 14. Hernia. 2011. PMID: 21755316 Clinical Trial.
-
Parietex™ Composite mesh versus DynaMesh®-IPOM for laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Nov;98(8):568-573. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0292. Epub 2016 Sep 23. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016. PMID: 27659375 Free PMC article.