Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2005 Dec;95(6):612-4.
doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61027-7.

Systemic anaphylaxis after the ingestion of pancake contaminated with the storage mite Blomia freemani

Affiliations
Case Reports

Systemic anaphylaxis after the ingestion of pancake contaminated with the storage mite Blomia freemani

Da-Chin Wen et al. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Systemic anaphylaxis after the ingestion of mite-contaminated food has rarely been reported.

Objective: To describe an 8-year-old boy in whom systemic anaphylaxis developed shortly after the ingestion of pancakes prepared with commercial pancake flour.

Methods: The patient underwent skin prick testing for house dust mites and with uncontaminated and mite-contaminated pancake flour. Specific IgE for mites and the main ingredients of the pancake flour were also evaluated, with titers for Der p 1, Der f 1, and Blo t 5 quantitated using immunochemical methods. A sample of pancake flour was examined microscopically for mites.

Results: The patient had positive skin prick test results to contaminated pancake flour extract (1 g/5 mL), Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and Dermatophagoides farinae but a negative skin test response to uncontaminated pancake flour. The patient's serum specific IgE analysis was positive for antibodies to dust and storage mite allergens. There was no response, however, to the main ingredients of the pancake mix. Microscopic examination of the pancake flour revealed the storage mite Blomia freemani. Using an immunochemical assay, we found that the contaminated flour contained 5.4 microg/g of the allergen Blo t 5 but no Der p 1 or Der f 1.

Conclusions: This patient's anaphylactic episode was the result of ingestion of the storage mite B. freemani. To our knowledge, this is the first reported systemic hypersensitivity reaction caused by this mite anywhere in the world.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types