Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele?
- PMID: 16401217
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00486.x
Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele?
Abstract
Background: Posterior vaginal wall prolapse is common in parous women and may be due to rectocele, enterocele or perineal hypermobility. Translabial ultrasound can be used to detect defects of the rectovaginal septum, that is, a 'true rectocele', potentially avoiding the need for defecation proctography. However, it is currently unknown whether specific sonographic appearances are associated with bowel symptoms.
Aims: To correlate symptoms of bowel dysfunction and sonographic findings.
Methods: In a prospective observational study, 505 women were seen during attendance at tertiary urogynaecological clinics and underwent a standardised interview, which included a set of questions regarding bowel function. They were assessed clinically and by translabial ultrasound, supine and after voiding. The presence of a rectocele was determined on maximal Valsalva.
Results: Clinically, 314 women (64%) were found to have a rectocele. There were associations between clinical staging and ampullary descent on ultrasound (P < 0.001), the presence of a true rectocele (P < 0.001) and the depth of a defect (P < 0.001). Defects of the rectovaginal septum ('true rectocele') were identified in 54%. They were associated with symptoms of incomplete bowel emptying (P < 0.001) and digitation (P = 0.002), and less so with dyschezia (P = 0.01), faecal incontinence (P = 0.02) and chronic constipation (P = 0.04).
Conclusions: True rectoceles are found in more than half of women presenting with pelvic floor disorders. This finding correlates strongly with clinical prolapse grading--large clinical rectoceles are more likely to be caused by a fascial defect. Incomplete bowel emptying and digitation are significantly associated with such defects detected on ultrasound.
Similar articles
-
Rectocele: Incidental or important? Observe or operate? Contemporary diagnosis and management in the multidisciplinary era.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Nov;34(11):e14453. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14453. Epub 2022 Sep 14. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022. PMID: 36102693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Oct;45(5):391-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00454.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005. PMID: 16171474
-
Rectocele or stool quality: what matters more for symptoms of obstructed defecation?Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Dec;13(4):265-8. doi: 10.1007/s10151-009-0527-x. Tech Coloproctol. 2009. PMID: 19685268
-
How large does a rectocele have to be to cause symptoms? A 3D/4D ultrasound study.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1355-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2709-6. Epub 2015 May 6. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25944658
-
Ultrasound in the investigation of posterior compartment vaginal prolapse and obstructed defecation.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;40(1):14-27. doi: 10.1002/uog.10131. Epub 2012 Jun 15. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22045564 Review.
Cited by
-
Rectocele: Incidental or important? Observe or operate? Contemporary diagnosis and management in the multidisciplinary era.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Nov;34(11):e14453. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14453. Epub 2022 Sep 14. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022. PMID: 36102693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Trends in Management of Defecatory Dysfunction, Posterior Compartment Prolapse, and Fecal Incontinence.Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2016 Jun;5(2):165-171. doi: 10.1007/s13669-016-0148-0. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27547494 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging in urogynaecology.Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Nov;22(11):1345-56. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1462-8. Epub 2011 May 28. Int Urogynecol J. 2011. PMID: 21626038 Review.
-
The effect of posterior colporrhaphy on anorectal function.Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jun;23(6):749-53. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1603-0. Epub 2011 Nov 24. Int Urogynecol J. 2012. PMID: 22113259
-
Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what's in it for the surgeon?Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Oct;22(10):1221-32. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1459-3. Epub 2011 Jun 9. Int Urogynecol J. 2011. PMID: 21656320 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical