Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception
- PMID: 16401424
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.071
Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception
Abstract
Experimental evidence suggests a link between perception and the execution of actions . In particular, it has been proposed that motor programs might directly influence visual action perception . According to this hypothesis, the acquisition of novel motor behaviors should improve their visual recognition, even in the absence of visual learning. We tested this prediction by using a new experimental paradigm that dissociates visual and motor learning during the acquisition of novel motor patterns. The visual recognition of gait patterns from point-light stimuli was assessed before and after nonvisual motor training. During this training, subjects were blindfolded and learned a novel coordinated upper-body movement based only on verbal and haptic feedback. The learned movement matched one of the visual test patterns. Despite the absence of visual stimulation during training, we observed a selective improvement of the visual recognition performance for the learned movement. Furthermore, visual recognition performance after training correlated strongly with the accuracy of the execution of the learned motor pattern. These results prove, for the first time, that motor learning has a direct and highly selective influence on visual action recognition that is not mediated by visual learning.
Comment in
-
Action Perception: seeing the world through a moving body.Curr Biol. 2006 Jan 10;16(1):R27-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.006. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 16401415
Similar articles
-
Nonvisual motor learning improves visual motion perception: evidence from violating the two-thirds power law.J Neurophysiol. 2010 Sep;104(3):1612-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.00974.2009. Epub 2010 Jul 7. J Neurophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20610788 Clinical Trial.
-
Internalizing agency of self-action: perception of one's own hand movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome.J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1592-601. doi: 10.1152/jn.00104.2006. Epub 2006 May 31. J Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16738220
-
Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies.J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):414-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.007. Epub 2006 May 26. J Physiol Paris. 2006. PMID: 16730432 Review.
-
Action Perception: seeing the world through a moving body.Curr Biol. 2006 Jan 10;16(1):R27-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.006. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 16401415
-
Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Mar;4(3):179-92. doi: 10.1038/nrn1057. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 12612631 Review.
Cited by
-
Altered perceptual sensitivity to kinematic invariants in Parkinson's disease.PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030369. Epub 2012 Feb 17. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22363430 Free PMC article.
-
Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 14;7:185. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00185. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23675338 Free PMC article.
-
Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions.Psychol Res. 2012 Jul;76(4):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0431-2. Epub 2012 Mar 13. Psychol Res. 2012. PMID: 22411563
-
Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation.Psychol Res. 2010 Jul;74(4):400-6. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0262-y. Epub 2009 Oct 25. Psychol Res. 2010. PMID: 19856185
-
Keeping an eye on the violinist: motor experts show superior timing consistency in a visual perception task.Psychol Res. 2010 Nov;74(6):579-85. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0280-9. Epub 2010 Mar 19. Psychol Res. 2010. PMID: 20300943 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources