Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jan;87(1):1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.113.

A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Marco Y Pang  1 , Jocelyn E Harris, Janice J Eng
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Marco Y Pang et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of a community-based exercise program on motor recovery and functional abilities of the paretic upper extremity in persons with chronic stroke.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Rehabilitation research laboratory and a community hall.

Participants: A sample of 63 people (> or =50y) with chronic deficits resulting from stroke (onset > or =1y).

Interventions: The arm group underwent an exercise program designed to improve upper-extremity function (1h/session, 3 sessions/wk for 19wk). The leg group underwent a lower-extremity exercise program.

Main outcome measures: The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), hand-held dynamometry (grip strength), and the Motor Activity Log.

Results: Multivariate analysis showed a significant group by time interaction (Wilks lambda=.726, P=.017), indicating that overall, the arm group had significantly more improvement than the leg group. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that gains in WMFT (functional ability) (P=.001) and FMA (P=.001) scores were significantly higher in the arm group. The amount of improvement was comparable to other novel treatment approaches such as constraint-induced movement therapy or robot-aided exercise training previously reported in chronic stroke. Participants with moderate arm impairment benefited more from the program.

Conclusions: The pilot study showed that a community-based exercise program can improve upper-extremity function in persons with chronic stroke. This outcome justifies a larger clinical trial to further assess efficacy and cost effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Exercise Training Protocol: Arm Group
Participants in the arm group were required to rotate through 3 exercise stations to work on different upper extremity tasks.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Exercise Training Protocol: Leg Group
Participants in the leg group underwent a leg exercise program.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study Flow Chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–98. - PubMed
    1. Parker VM, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med. 1986;8:69–73. - PubMed
    1. Heller A, Wade D, Wood V, Sunderland A, Hewer R, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:714–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson C, Jamrozik K, Stewart-Wynne E. Physical disability after stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Clin Exp Neurol. 1990;27:121–4. - PubMed
    1. Gresham GE, Fitzpatrick TE, Wolf PA, McNamara PM, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Residual disability in survivors of stroke-the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1975;6:954–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding