Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan 28;332(7535):206-10.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38675.677963.3A. Epub 2006 Jan 9.

Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views

Affiliations

Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views

Mary Dixon-Woods et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore trial participants' responses to receiving a summary of the results of a trial in pregnancy.

Design: Qualitative study with semistructured interviews.

Participants: 20 women who had when pregnant participated in the ORACLE trial of antibiotics for preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes and requested a copy of the trial results.

Results: Less than a fifth of women who participated in the ORACLE trial indicated that they wished to receive the trial results. Reactions to the leaflet summarising the trial results were generally positive or neutral, although some women had difficulty in understanding the leaflet, and there was evidence of possible negative implications for women who had adverse outcomes. Women requested the results because they were interested in being able to complete their own personal narrative. They wished to know to which arm of the trial they had been allocated and the implications for their own pregnancy, and they were disappointed with receiving a generic summary. Women's accounts indicated some confusion about the trial findings.

Conclusions: Recommendations that research participants be routinely provided with the results of studies have been made without the benefit of research to show the consequences of doing this or how it should best be managed. Caution is needed, as is more evaluation of how feedback of results should be handled, and assessment of the risks, benefits, and costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Offering results to research participants.
    MacNeil SD, Fernandez CV. MacNeil SD, et al. BMJ. 2006 Jan 28;332(7535):188-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7535.188. BMJ. 2006. PMID: 16439373 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Offering results to research participants.
    Dinnett EM, Mungall MM, Gordon C, Ronald ES, Gaw A. Dinnett EM, et al. BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):549-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7540.549-b. BMJ. 2006. PMID: 16513719 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Weijer C. Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. IRB Ethics Hum Res 2003;25: 12-9. - PubMed
    1. Goodare H, Smith R. The rights of patients in research. BMJ 1995;310: 1277-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. United Kingdom Parliament. Draft guidelines for ethical research with patients. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmsctech/332/0062116... (accessed 19 Nov 2005).
    1. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. 2nd ed. London: DoH, 2005.
    1. Association for Improvements in Maternity Care (AIMS), National Childbirth Trust. A charter for ethical research in maternity care. London: AIMS/NCT, 1997. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances