Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?
- PMID: 16401682
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3365
Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?
Erratum in
- J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 20;24(12):1966
Abstract
Purpose: In 1999, the National Cancer Policy Board called attention to the quality of cancer care in the United States and recommended establishing a quality monitoring system with the capability of regularly reporting on the quality of care for patients with cancer.
Methods: Using data from a patient survey 4 years after diagnosis and review of medical records, we determined the percentage of stage I to III breast cancer and stage II to III colorectal cancer survivors in five metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) across the United States who received recommended care specified by a comprehensive set of explicit quality measures.
Results: Two thousand three hundred sixty-six (63%) of 3,775 eligible patients responded to the survey, and 85% consented to have their medical records reviewed. Our final analytic sample (n = 1,765) included 47% of the eligible patients. Patients with breast and colorectal cancer received 86% of recommended care (95% CI, 86% to 87%) and 78% of recommended care (95% CI, 77% to 79%), respectively. Adherence to quality measures was less than 85% for 18 of the 36 breast cancer measures, and significant variation across MSAs was observed for seven quality measures. The percent adherence was less than 85% for 14 of the 25 colorectal cancer measures, and one quality measure demonstrated statistically significant variation across the MSAs.
Conclusion: Initial management of patients with breast and colorectal cancer in the United States seemed consistent with evidence-based practice; however, substantial variation in adherence to some quality measures point to significant opportunities for improvement.
Similar articles
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3631-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5068. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18640941
-
National quality validation programs for breast centers.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007 Oct;7(10):1357-62. doi: 10.1586/14737140.7.10.1357. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007. PMID: 17944561
-
Adherence to quality indicators and survival in patients with breast cancer.Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):217-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181893c4a. Med Care. 2009. PMID: 19169123
-
Assessing the quality of prostate cancer care.Curr Opin Urol. 2008 May;18(3):297-302. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f9b393. Curr Opin Urol. 2008. PMID: 18382239 Review.
-
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 May;65(6):757-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.055. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17466195 Review.
Cited by
-
Measures of Appropriateness and Value for Breast Surgeons and Their Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Choosing Wisely (®) Initiative.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3112-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5327-8. Epub 2016 Jun 22. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27334216 Free PMC article.
-
Developing the medical oncology treatment plan and summary.J Oncol Pract. 2006 Mar;2(2):95-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2006.2.2.95. J Oncol Pract. 2006. PMID: 20871723 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Current Therapeutic Approaches to DCIS.J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2018 Dec;23(4):279-291. doi: 10.1007/s10911-018-9415-1. Epub 2018 Sep 29. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2018. PMID: 30267199 Review.
-
Prediction of post-operative necrosis after mastectomy: a pilot study utilizing optical diffusion imaging spectroscopy.World J Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov 25;7:91. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-7-91. World J Surg Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19939277 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of cancer chemotherapy-related problems, their relation to health-related quality of life and associated supportive care: a cross-sectional survey.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Dec;24(12):4901-4911. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3346-4. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27465050
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical