Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease
- PMID: 16401776
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.505636
Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease
Abstract
Background: Studies have examined the use of evidence-based therapies for coronary artery disease (CAD) in the short term and at hospital discharge, but few have evaluated long-term use.
Methods and results: Using the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease for the years 1995 to 2002, we determined the annual prevalence and consistency of self-reported use of aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering agents, and their combinations in all CAD patients and of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in those with and without heart failure. Logistic-regression models identified characteristics associated with consistent use (reported on > or =2 consecutive follow-up surveys and then through death, withdrawal, or study end), and Cox proportional-hazards models explored the association of consistent use with mortality. Use of all agents and combinations thereof increased yearly. In 2002, 83% reported aspirin use; 61%, beta-blocker use; 63%, lipid-lowering therapy use; 54%, aspirin and beta-blocker use; and 39%, use of all 3. Consistent use was as follows: For aspirin, 71%; beta-blockers, 46%; lipid-lowering therapy, 44%; aspirin and beta-blockers, 36%; and all 3, 21%. Among patients without heart failure, 39% reported ACEI use in 2002; consistent use was 20%. Among heart failure patients, ACEI use was 51% in 2002 and consistent use, 39%. Except for ACEIs among patients without heart failure, consistent use was associated with lower adjusted mortality: Aspirin hazard ratio (HR), 0.58 and 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54 to 0.62; beta-blockers, HR, 0.63 and 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.67; lipid-lowering therapy, HR, 0.52 and 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; all 3, HR, 0.67 and 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.77; aspirin and beta-blockers, HR, 0.61 and 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.65; and ACEIs among heart failure patients, HR, 0.75 and 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.84.
Conclusions: Use of evidence-based therapies for CAD has improved but remains suboptimal. Although improved discharge prescription of these agents is needed, considerable attention must also be focused on understanding and improving long-term adherence.
Comment in
-
Evidence-based medicine: making the grade: miles to go before we sleep.Circulation. 2006 Jan 17;113(2):178-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.592238. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16418446 No abstract available.
-
Letter regarding article by Newby et al, "Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease".Circulation. 2006 Aug 8;114(6):e240; author reply e241. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615393. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16894044 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with discharge lipid-lowering drug prescription in patients hospitalized for coronary artery disease (from the Get With the Guidelines database).Am J Cardiol. 2008 May 1;101(9):1242-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.12.020. Epub 2008 Mar 5. Am J Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18435951
-
Evidence-based medication use among Chinese patients with acute coronary syndromes at the time of hospital discharge and 1 year after hospitalization: results from the Clinical Pathways for Acute Coronary Syndromes in China (CPACS) study.Am Heart J. 2009 Mar;157(3):509-516.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.09.026. Epub 2008 Dec 17. Am Heart J. 2009. PMID: 19249422
-
Adherence to evidence-based therapies after discharge for acute coronary syndromes: an ongoing prospective, observational study.Am J Med. 2004 Jul 15;117(2):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.041. Am J Med. 2004. PMID: 15234641
-
The role of in-hospital initiation of cardiovascular protective therapies to improve treatment rates and clinical outcomes.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003;4 Suppl 3:S37-46. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003. PMID: 14564233 Review.
-
The role of in-hospital initiation of cardioprotective therapies to improve treatment rates and clinical outcomes.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2002;3 Suppl 3:S2-S10. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2002. PMID: 12447156 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence after myocardial infarction.Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2097-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01462.x. Epub 2012 Sep 21. Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22998129 Free PMC article.
-
Does the association between adherence to statin medications and mortality depend on measurement approach? A retrospective cohort study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0339-z. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017. PMID: 28427340 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative Strategies to Achieve Cardiovascular Mortality Goals in China and India: A Microsimulation of Target- Versus Risk-Based Blood Pressure Treatment.Circulation. 2016 Mar 1;133(9):840-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019985. Epub 2016 Jan 13. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 26762520 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic polytherapy after myocardial infarction: the trade-off between hospital and community-based providers in determining adherence to medication.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01969-9. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021. PMID: 33853534 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors Control After an Acute Coronary Syndrome and Association with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Single Center Experience in Latin-America.High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023 Mar;30(2):183-189. doi: 10.1007/s40292-023-00560-x. Epub 2023 Feb 3. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023. PMID: 36735221
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous