Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive
- PMID: 16402860
- PMCID: PMC1334241
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040028
Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive
Abstract
When one finger touches the other, the resulting tactile sensation is perceived as weaker than the same stimulus externally imposed. This attenuation of sensation could result from a predictive process that subtracts the expected sensory consequences of the action, or from a postdictive process that alters the perception of sensations that are judged after the event to be self-generated. In this study we observe attenuation even when the fingers unexpectedly fail to make contact, supporting a predictive process. This predictive attenuation of self-generated sensation may have evolved to enhance the perception of sensations with an external cause.
Figures

Comment in
-
Self-generated touch: a neural perspective.PLoS Biol. 2006 Feb;4(2):e48. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040048. Epub 2006 Jan 17. PLoS Biol. 2006. PMID: 20076531 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven.Curr Biol. 2005 Jun 21;15(12):1125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.023. Curr Biol. 2005. PMID: 15964278
-
Relationships between touch sensations and estimated population responses of peripheral afferent mechanoreceptors.Exp Brain Res. 1993;94(1):120-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00230475. Exp Brain Res. 1993. PMID: 8335067
-
Comparative Evaluation of Tactile Sensation by Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation.IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):130-134. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2016.2605084. Epub 2016 Sep 5. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017. PMID: 28113382
-
Blocking tactile input to one finger using anaesthetic enhances touch perception and learning in other fingers.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Apr;148(4):713-727. doi: 10.1037/xge0000514. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019. PMID: 30973263 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dynamic use of tactile afferent signals in control of dexterous manipulation.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;508:397-410. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0713-0_45. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002. PMID: 12171136 Review.
Cited by
-
Serial dependencies for externally and self-generated stimuli.J Vis. 2024 Oct 3;24(11):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.11.1. J Vis. 2024. PMID: 39361274 Free PMC article.
-
Gating of vibrotactile detection during visually guided bimanual reaches.Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(3):411-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2050-8. Epub 2009 Oct 23. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 19851758
-
Awareness as observational heterarchy.Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 1;4:686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00686. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 24101912 Free PMC article.
-
The roles of vision and proprioception in spatial tuning of sensory attenuation.Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jan 11;243(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06982-w. Exp Brain Res. 2025. PMID: 39798010 Free PMC article.
-
Divisive attenuation based on noisy sensorimotor predictions accounts for excess variability in self-touch.J Neurophysiol. 2025 Jul 1;134(1):407-428. doi: 10.1152/jn.00055.2025. Epub 2025 Jun 18. J Neurophysiol. 2025. PMID: 40531356 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bell CC. Memory-based expectations in electrosensory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11:481–487. - PubMed
-
- Cullen KE. Sensory signals during active versus passive movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:698–706. - PubMed
-
- Blakemore SJ, Frith CD, Wolpert DM. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999;11:551–559. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources