Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan 11:6:1.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-1.

Profit and loss analysis for an intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan: a tool for strategic management

Affiliations

Profit and loss analysis for an intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan: a tool for strategic management

Pengyu Cao et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Accurate cost estimate and a profit and loss analysis are necessary for health care practice. We performed an actual financial analysis for an intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital in Japan, and tried to discuss the health care policy and resource allocation decisions that have an impact on critical intensive care.

Methods: The costs were estimated by a department level activity based costing method, and the profit and loss analysis was based on a break-even point analysis. The data used included the monthly number of patients, the revenue, and the direct and indirect costs of the ICU in 2003.

Results: The results of this analysis showed that the total costs of USD 2,678,052 of the ICU were mainly incurred due to direct costs of 88.8%. On the other hand, the actual annual total patient days in the ICU were 1,549 which resulted in revenues of USD 2,295,044. However, it was determined that the ICU required at least 1,986 patient days within one fiscal year based on a break-even point analysis. As a result, an annual deficit of USD 383,008 has occurred in the ICU.

Conclusion: These methods are useful for determining the profits or losses for the ICU practice, and how to evaluate and to improve it. In this study, the results indicate that most ICUs in Japanese hospitals may not be profitable at the present time. As a result, in order to increase the income to make up for this deficit, an increase of 437 patient days in the ICU in one fiscal year is needed, and the number of patients admitted to the ICU should thus be increased without increasing the number of beds or staff members. Increasing the number of patients referred from cooperating hospitals and clinics therefore appears to be the best strategy for achieving these goals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of a break-even point analysis for the ICU. BEP: break-even point, pds : patient days, BvPds : break-even volume patient-days, CC: costs that change with the change in the number of patient days, NCC: costs that do not change with the number of patient days

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Graf J, Graf C, Janssens U. Analysis of resource use and cost-generating factors in a German medical intensive care unit employing the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) Intensive Care Medicine. 2002;28:324–331. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1201-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edbrooke DL, Stevens VG, Hibbert CL, Mann AJ, Wilson AJ. A new method of accurately identifying costs of individual patients in intensive care: the initial results. Intensive Care Medicine. 1997;23:645–650. doi: 10.1007/s001340050388. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Report from the Second American Thoracic Society Workshop on Outcomes Research Understanding Costs and Cost-Effectiveness in Critical Care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:540–550. - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Suter P, Bihari D, Bruining H. Organization of intensive care units in Europe: lessons from the EPIC study. Intensive Care Medicine. 1997;23:1181–1184. doi: 10.1007/s001340050479. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pappachan JV, Millar B, Bennett ED, Smith GB. Comparison of outcome from intensive care admission after adjustment for case mix by the APACHE III prognostic system. Chest. 1999;115:802–810. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.3.802. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms