Cervical nerve root stimulation. Part I: technical aspects and normal data
- PMID: 16403485
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.011
Cervical nerve root stimulation. Part I: technical aspects and normal data
Abstract
Objective: Cervical nerve root stimulation (CRS) is a technique of assessing the proximal segments of motor axons destined to upper extremity muscles. Few studies report normal values. The objective was to determine CMAP onset-latencies and CMAP amplitude, area, and duration changes in healthy controls for the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), biceps, and riceps muscles. In addition, to determine the tolerability of CRS, as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS).
Methods: We studied 21 healthy volunteers prospectively with CRS using four target muscles (APB, ADM, biceps, and triceps) bilaterally. Collision studies were used in all APB recordings. VAS was obtained in all subjects.
Results: Mean CMAP onset-latencies were: APB 14 +/- 1.5 ms; ADM 14.2 +/- 1.5 ms; biceps 5.4 +/- 0.6 ms; triceps 5.4 +/- 1.0 ms. Onset-latency significantly correlated with height for all nerves. The mean change in CMAP amplitude and area (%) between most distal stimulation and CRS was: APB reduction of 15.1 +/- 11.6 and 4.9 +/- 3.6%; ADM reduction of 21.1 +/- 10.7 and 17.2 +/- 8.8; biceps reduction of 10 +/- 11.5 and reduction of 8.7 +/- 6.8; triceps increase of 3.3 +/- 5.2 and 11.0 +/- 9.9% respectively. Mean CMAP duration change between most distal stimulation and CRS was: APB, increase of 20.4 +/- 7.4%; ADM, increase of 14.4 +/- 8.5%; biceps, increase of 13.9 +/- 10.8%; triceps, increase of 7.7 +/- 6.7%. The mean VAS score was 3.8 +/- 1.2, and all subjects completed the study.
Conclusions: The present study establishes normative data and indicates that CRS is a well-tolerated technique.
Significance: The normal values may be used as reference data for the needle CRS technique in the assessment of proximal conduction abnormalities.
Similar articles
-
Cervical nerve root stimulation. Part II: findings in primary demyelinating neuropathies and motor neuron disease.Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.012. Epub 2006 Jan 3. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16403674
-
[A method of electrical cervical motor root stimulation: effect of stimulation parameters and normal values].EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1989 Mar;20(1):39-49. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1989. PMID: 2539962 German.
-
[Motor evoked potentials of upper limbs].Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000 Nov;16(4):196-7, 200, S1. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000. PMID: 12536964 Chinese.
-
Dynamic change of proximal conduction in demyelinating neuropathies: a cervical magnetic stimulation combined with maximum voluntary contraction.Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;118(4):741-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.013. Epub 2007 Feb 20. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17317300
-
Kugelberg lecture: principles and pitfalls of nerve conduction studies.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;106(6):470-6. doi: 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00025-x. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9741746 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Assessment of Neurodegenerative Disease.Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Jan;14(1):91-106. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0487-6. Neurotherapeutics. 2017. PMID: 27830492 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee.Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25797650 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cervicothoracic multisegmental transpinal evoked potentials in humans.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 7;8(10):e76940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076940. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24282479 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources