Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Jan;94(1):41-7.

Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE

Sharon S-L Wong  1 , Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE

Sharon S-L Wong et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The ability to accurately identify articles about therapy in large bibliographic databases such as EMBASE is important for researchers and clinicians. Our study aimed to develop optimal search strategies for detecting sound treatment studies in EMBASE in the year 2000.

Methods: Hand searches of journals were compared with retrievals from EMBASE for candidate search strategies. Six trained research assistants reviewed fifty-five journals indexed in EMBASE and rated articles using purpose and quality indicators. Candidate search strategies were developed for identifying treatment articles and then tested, and the retrievals were compared with the hand-search data. The operating characteristics of the strategies were calculated.

Results: Three thousand eight hundred fifty articles were original studies on treatment, of which 1,256 (32.6%) were methodologically sound. Combining search terms revealed a top performing strategy (random:.tw. OR clinical trial:.mp. OR exp health care quality) with sensitivity of 98.9% and specificity of 72.0%. Maximizing specificity, a top performing strategy (double-blind:.mp. OR placebo:.tw. OR blind: .tw.) achieved a value over 96.0%, but with compromised sensitivity at 51.7%. A 3-term strategy achieved the best optimization of sensitivity and specificity (random:.tw. OR placebo:.mp. OR double-blind:.tw.), with both these values over 92.0%.

Conclusion: Search strategies can achieve high performance for retrieving sound treatment studies in EMBASE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Formula for calculating the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of EMBASE searches for detecting clinically sound treatment studies. Sensitivity = a/(a+c); specificity = d/(b+d); precision = a/(a+b); accuracy = (a+d)/(a+b+c+d). All articles classified during the manual review of the literature = (a+b+c+d)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, and Bero LA. Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA. 2002 Jun 5; 287(21):2805–8. - PubMed
    1. Birken CS, Parkin PC. In which journals will pediatricians find the best evidence for clinical practice? Pediatrics. 1999 May; 103(5 pt.1):941–7. - PubMed
    1. Alper BS, Hand JA, Elliott SG, Kinkade S, Hauan MJ, Onion DK, and Sklar BM. How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for primary care? J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Oct; 92(4):429–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, and Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
    1. McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, and Haynes RB. What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals? BMC Med. 2004 Sep 6; 2:33. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources