Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jan;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S35-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00307.x.

The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships

Affiliations
Review

The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships

Michael Weiner et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Interpersonal relationships and information are intertwined as essential cornerstones of health care. Although information technology (IT) has done much to advance medicine, we are not even close to realizing its full potential. Indeed, issues related to mismanaging health information often undermine relationship-centered care. Information technology must be implemented in ways that preserve and uplift relationships in care, while accommodating major deficiencies in managing information and making medical decisions. Increased collaboration between experts in IT and relationship-centered care is needed, along with inclusion of relationship-based measures in informatics research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Interplay between relationships and flow of information. Information is collected, stored, and processed before treatment. Some methods of collecting and processing clinical information can be performed without relationships. Capitalizing on these possibilities can create efficiencies and higher yields for relationship-centered care.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Theory of how medical training and practice influence relationships. Although low quality of patient-physician relationships may stem from inadequate empathy and communications skills, we postulate that medical training and practice has often led to this state, through introducing competing goals and fostering the mismanagement of health information.

Comment in

  • Complexity and healing relationships.
    Duffy FD. Duffy FD. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S45-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00332.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 16405710 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Quill TE, et al. Partnerships in patient care: a contractual approach. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:228–34. - PubMed
    1. Participants in the Bayer-Fetzer Conference on Physician-Patient Communication in Medical Education. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76:390–3. - PubMed
    1. Williams GC, Frankel RM, Campbell TL, Deci EL, et al. Research on relationship-centered care and healthcare outcomes from the Rochester biopsychosocial program: a self-determination theory integration. Families, systems & health. J Collab Fam HealthCare. 2000;18:79–90.
    1. Malloch K, Sluyter D, Moore N, et al. Relationship-centered care: achieving true value in healthcare. J Nurs Admin. 2000;30:379–85. - PubMed
    1. Miller EA, et al. The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: effects on doctor-patient communication. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9:1–7. - PubMed

Publication types