Communication with patients during the prenatal testing procedure: an explorative qualitative study
- PMID: 16406463
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.013
Communication with patients during the prenatal testing procedure: an explorative qualitative study
Abstract
Objective: While generally two phases of prenatal genetic counseling are distinguished, i.e. pre- and post-test counseling, we revealed a third form of communication during the testing procedure. The content of this intermediate communication was explored.
Methods: A secondary analysis was performed on data obtained in another observational study, which was focussed on how indefinite testing results are clarified. Thirteen testing trajectories in which communication with parents took place during the testing procedure were further analysed.
Results: In the majority of cases the content of intermediate communication was similar to the content of pre-test counseling. In four cases the content was different, because the communication involved the parents in decision-making about a testing result, which was still being processed.
Conclusion: Communication in (prenatal) genetic testing is not always restricted to separate phases, but can be an ongoing process occurring parallel to, and sometimes even intertwined with, the testing process. The advocated model of shared decision-making might work better once it is determined if the decision concerns the area wherein the provider is the expert, or the patient.
Practice implications: Further research into the process of continuing decision-making could clarify how providers' and patients' responsibilities regarding the diagnostic process are distributed. Meanwhile, the possible occurrence of continuous decision-making should be mentioned in (prenatal) genetic counseling.
Similar articles
-
The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making?Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Mar;56(3):302-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.03.004. Patient Educ Couns. 2005. PMID: 15721973
-
Patient decision-making for clinical genetics.Nurs Inq. 2007 Mar;14(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00349.x. Nurs Inq. 2007. PMID: 17298604
-
Shifting goals in medical communication. Determinants of goal detection and response formation.Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Patient Educ Couns. 2009. PMID: 19135823 Review.
-
Prenatal diagnosis: chances, choices.J Fla Med Assoc. 1997 Aug-Sep;84(6):374-8. J Fla Med Assoc. 1997. PMID: 9379162
-
A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.012. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16242293 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.J Genet Couns. 2008 Oct;17(5):434-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-008-9173-0. Epub 2008 Sep 13. J Genet Couns. 2008. PMID: 18791813 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical