Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):145-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.010. Epub 2006 Jan 6.

Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients

Affiliations

Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients

Dena J Schulman-Green et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Older adults are less likely than other age groups to participate in clinical decision-making. To enhance participation, we sought to understand how older adults consider and discuss their life and health goals during the clinical encounter.

Methods: We conducted six focus groups: four with community-dwelling older persons (n=42), one with geriatricians and internists (n=6), and one with rehabilitation nurses (n=5). Participants were asked to discuss: patients' life and health goals; communication about goals, and perception of agreement about health goals. Group interactions were tape-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis.

Results: All participants were willing to discuss goals, but varied in the degree to which they did so. Reasons for non-discussion included that goal setting was not a priority given limited time, visits focused on symptoms, mutual perception of disinterest, and the presumption that all patients' goals were the same.

Conclusion: Interventions to enhance goal setting need to address key barriers to promoting goals discussions. Participants recognized the benefits of goal setting, however, training and instruments are needed to integrate goal setting into medicine.

Practice implications: Setting goals initially and reviewing them periodically may be a comprehensive, time-efficient way of integrating patients' goals into their care plans.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM), Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. The National Academies Press, 2001.
    1. Bensing J. Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based and patient-centered medicine. Pat Educ Couns 2000;39:17–25. - PubMed
    1. Arora N, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: Who really wants to participate? Med Care 2000;38,335–341. - PubMed
    1. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys. Behav Med 1998;24,81–88. - PubMed
    1. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Int Med 1996;156,1414–1420. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources