Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled
- PMID: 16406886
- DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00064-9
Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled
Abstract
Purpose: We determined the influence of the extent of needle biopsy sampling on the detection rate of cancer on first biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of HGPIN.
Materials and methods: We identified 791 patients with HGPIN on the initial biopsy who had a followup biopsy within 1 year of their diagnosis. The mean interval from diagnosis of HGPIN to re-biopsy was 4.6 months. In the initial biopsy with HGPIN, 323 men had 8 or more cores (median 10, range 8 to 26) and 332 men had 6 core biopsies.
Results: In the 6 core initial sampling group, the risk of cancer on re-biopsy was 20.8% compared to only 13.3% following an initial 8 core or more sampling (p = 0.011). With 6 core biopsies for both the initial and re-biopsy the risk of cancer was 14.1% (group 1). With an initial 6 core biopsy and 8 core or more biopsy on followup, the risk of cancer was 31.9% (group 2). With 8 core or more biopsy sampling for both initial and repeat biopsies, the risk for cancer was 14.6% (group 3). The differences between groups 1 and 3 as compared to group 2 were statistically significant (p = 0.001 and p <0.0001, respectively).
Conclusions: With relatively poor sampling (6 cores) on the initial biopsy, associated cancers are missed resulting in only HGPIN on the initial biopsy, and with relatively poor sampling on re-biopsy there is also a relatively low risk of finding cancer on re-biopsy (group 1). With poor sampling on the initial biopsy and better sampling on re-biopsy, some of these initially missed cancers are detected on re-biopsy yielding a higher detection of cancer (group 2). Sampling more extensively on the initial biopsy detects many associated cancers, such that when only HGPIN is found they often represent isolated HGPIN. Therefore, re-biopsy even with good sampling does not detect many additional cancers (group 3). Our study demonstrates that the risk of cancer on biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of HGPIN (13.3%) is not that predictive of cancer on re-biopsy if good sampling (8 or more cores) is initially performed. For patients diagnosed with HGPIN on extended initial core sampling, a repeat biopsy within the first year is unnecessary in the absence of other clinical indicators of cancer.
Comment in
-
The continuing search for meaningful prognostic information from prostate biopsy.J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):16-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00256-9. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16406862 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care.J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):820-34. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00337-X. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16469560 Review.
-
The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):770-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06728.x. Epub 2007 Jan 16. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17233800
-
The proportion of cores with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended-pattern needle biopsy is significantly associated with prostate cancer on site-directed repeat biopsy.BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):765-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06681.x. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17378840
-
Widespread high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostatic needle biopsy: a significant likelihood of subsequently diagnosed adenocarcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Sep;30(9):1184-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213324.97294.54. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006. PMID: 16931964
-
Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy.J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):866-70. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11490235 Review.
Cited by
-
[Diagnostic histopathology of prostate cancer].Urologe A. 2013 Jul;52(7):933-41. doi: 10.1007/s00120-013-3222-5. Urologe A. 2013. PMID: 23784677 German.
-
Is repeat biopsy for isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary?Rev Urol. 2007 Summer;9(3):124-31. Rev Urol. 2007. PMID: 17934569 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a short RNA within Prostate Cancer Gene 3 in the predictive role for future cancer using non-malignant prostate biopsies.PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0175070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175070. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28380027 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical features and prognosis of prostate cancer with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.Korean J Urol. 2015 Aug;56(8):565-71. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.565. Epub 2015 Jul 24. Korean J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26279825 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of prior biopsy scheme on prostate cancer detection for repeat biopsy population: results of the 14-core prostate biopsy technique.Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(1):189-95. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9009-5. Epub 2006 Jun 1. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007. PMID: 16835725
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical