The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness
- PMID: 16415084
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji098
The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness
Abstract
This study used anthropometric data in the form of Farkas' proportion indices in order to quantify facial attractiveness, and to relate measured change through surgery, to clinical judgement. Standardized photographs of 15 orthognathic patients were used in album form and rated by 10 experienced clinicians: album 1 for facial attractiveness (before surgery) and album 2 for improvement in facial attractiveness (before and after surgery). Twenty-five proportion indices were selected and linear measurements recorded from the pre- and post-surgical photographs. The corresponding change in indices and in clinicians' scores were compared. The clinicians' assessment of the degree of improvement in facial appearance achieved through surgery, related closely to the scores produced by the change in proportion indices (r = 0.698, P = 0.004). Clinical assessment demonstrated a clear inverse relationship between initial attractiveness rating and the degree of improvement achieved through orthognathic surgery (r = -0.781, P = 0.001). The results showed good repeatability in terms of clinical assessment, photography and digitization. The method would appear to have potential for further development, possibly into a 'facial attractiveness index' for the objectives of quantification of improvement achieved through treatment.
Similar articles
-
Ranking facial attractiveness.Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):340-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji042. Eur J Orthod. 2005. PMID: 16043472 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):690-6; quiz 801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.030. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 16360907
-
Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.Aust Orthod J. 2004 Nov;20(2):51-63. Aust Orthod J. 2004. PMID: 16429875
-
The ideal of facial beauty: a review.J Orofac Orthop. 2007 Jan;68(1):6-16. doi: 10.1007/s00056-007-0604-6. J Orofac Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17238049 Review. English, German.
-
Suggestions for forecasting and monitoring facial growth.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Aug;104(2):105-20. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81000-5. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993. PMID: 8338063 Review.
Cited by
-
Frontal facial proportions of 12-year-old southern Chinese: a photogrammetric study.Head Face Med. 2015 Aug 14;11:26. doi: 10.1186/s13005-015-0084-7. Head Face Med. 2015. PMID: 26271276 Free PMC article.
-
Automated craniofacial landmarks detection on 3D image using geometry characteristics information.BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 4;19(Suppl 13):548. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2548-9. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019. PMID: 30717658 Free PMC article.
-
Wearing complete dental prostheses - Effects on perioral morphology.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jul 1;21(4):e413-9. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21102. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016. PMID: 27031069 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of Maxillofacial Problems in Extraoral Photographs by Panel Members: A Pilot Study.Turk J Orthod. 2019 Mar;32(1):41-46. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18033. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Turk J Orthod. 2019. PMID: 30944899 Free PMC article.
-
Vertical and horizontal facial proportions of Indian American men.Anat Cell Biol. 2016 Jun;49(2):125-31. doi: 10.5115/acb.2016.49.2.125. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Anat Cell Biol. 2016. PMID: 27382514 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources