Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Jan-Feb;121(1):74-83.
doi: 10.1177/003335490612100114.

The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates

Holly B Shulman  1 , Brenda Colley Gilbert, Coi Gl Msphbrenda, Amy Lansky
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates

Holly B Shulman et al. Public Health Rep. 2006 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Our objectives were to describe the methodology of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), examine recent response rates, determine characteristics associated with response, and track response patterns over time.

Methods: PRAMS is a mixed-mode surveillance system, using mail and telephone surveys. Rates for response, contact, cooperation, and refusal were computed for 2001. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between maternal and infant characteristics and the likelihood of response. Response patterns from 1996 to 2001 were compared for nine states.

Results: The median response rate for the 23 states in 2001 was 76% (range: 49% to 84%). Cooperation rates ranged from 86% to 97% (median 91%); contact rates ranged from 58% to 93% (median 82%). Response rates were higher for women who were older, white, married, had more education, were first-time mothers, received early prenatal care, and had a normal birthweight infant. Education level was the most consistent predictor of response, followed by marital status and maternal race. From 1996 to 2001, response to the initial mailing decreased in all states compared, but the decrease was offset by increases in mail follow-up and telephone response rates. Overall response rates remained unchanged.

Conclusions: The PRAMS mail/telephone methodology is an effective means of reaching most recent mothers in the 23 states examined, but some population subgroups are more difficult to reach than others. Through more intensive follow-up efforts, PRAMS states have been able to maintain high response rates over time despite decreases in response to the initial mailing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Response, contact, and cooperation rates, PRAMS 1996–2001 (average over nine states)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Hox JJ, De Leeuw ED. A comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys. Quality Quantity. 1994;28:329–44.
    1. Steeh C. Trends in non-response rates, 1952–1979. Public Opin Q. 1981;45:40–57.
    1. Connelly NA, Brown TL, Decker DJ. Factors affecting response rates to natural resource-focused mail surveys: empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Society & Natural Resources. 2003;16:541–9.
    1. Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opin Q. 2000;64:413–28. - PubMed
    1. Dillman D, Sinclair M, Clark J. Alexandria (VA): American Statistical Association; 1992. Mail-back response rates for simplified decennial census questionnaire designs. American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section; pp. 776–83. 1992 Aug 9–13; Boston.