Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 16418463
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.3.285
Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial
Erratum in
- JAMA. 2006 Jun 21;295(23):2726
Abstract
Context: Many men with inguinal hernia have minimal symptoms. Whether deferring surgical repair is a safe and acceptable option has not been assessed.
Objective: To compare pain and the physical component score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 Version 2 survey at 2 years in men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias treated with watchful waiting or surgical repair.
Design, setting, and participants: Randomized trial conducted January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2004, at 5 North American centers and enrolling 720 men (364 watchful waiting, 356 surgical repair) followed up for 2 to 4.5 years.
Interventions: Watchful-waiting patients were followed up at 6 months and annually and watched for hernia symptoms; repair patients received standard open tension-free repair and were followed up at 3 and 6 months and annually.
Main outcome measures: Pain and discomfort interfering with usual activities at 2 years and change in PCS from baseline to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were complications, patient-reported pain, functional status, activity levels, and satisfaction with care.
Results: Primary intention-to-treat outcomes were similar at 2 years for watchful waiting vs surgical repair: pain limiting activities (5.1% vs 2.2%, respectively; P = .06 [corrected]); PCS (improvement over baseline, 0.29 points vs 0.13 points; P = .79). Twenty-three percent of patients assigned to watchful waiting crossed over to receive surgical repair (increase in hernia-related pain was the most common reason offered); 17% assigned to receive repair crossed over to watchful waiting. Self-reported pain in watchful-waiting patients crossing over improved after repair. Occurrence of postoperative hernia-related complications was similar in patients who received repair as assigned and in watchful-waiting patients who crossed over. One watchful-waiting patient (0.3%) experienced acute hernia incarceration without strangulation within 2 years; a second had acute incarceration with bowel obstruction at 4 years, with a frequency of 1.8/1000 patient-years inclusive of patients followed up for as long as 4.5 years.
Conclusions: Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Delaying surgical repair until symptoms increase is safe because acute hernia incarcerations occur rarely.Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00263250.
Comment in
-
The asymptomatic hernia: "if it's not broken, don't fix it".JAMA. 2006 Jan 18;295(3):328-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.3.328. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16418470 No abstract available.
-
Repair of inguinal hernia vs watchful waiting.JAMA. 2006 Jun 21;295(23):2724-5; author reply 2725. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.23.2724-b. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16788127 No abstract available.
-
Repair of inguinal hernia vs watchful waiting.JAMA. 2006 Jun 21;295(23):2724; author reply 2725. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.23.2724-a. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16788128 No abstract available.
-
Watchful waiting was as safe as surgical repair for minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias.Evid Based Med. 2006 Jun;11(3):73. doi: 10.1136/ebm.11.3.73. Evid Based Med. 2006. PMID: 17213095 No abstract available.
-
Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons evidence-based reviews in surgery. 26. Watchful waiting versus repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men.Can J Surg. 2008 Oct;51(5):406-9. Can J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18841218 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
