Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;16(5):981-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0047-7. Epub 2006 Jan 18.

Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions

Affiliations

Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions

Sebastiaan Jensch et al. Eur Radiol. 2006 May.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the effective dose that is currently used in CT colonography using scan parameters that were collected for this purpose, and to investigate trends in time. PubMed was systematically searched from 1996 until January 2004 for studies investigating CT colonography. Research institutions were contacted and asked for their current scan protocol. Thirty-six institutions published 74 studies. Twenty-eight of the 36 institutions provided their current protocol. The median effective dose in 2004 was 5.1 mSv (range 1.2-11.7 mSv) per position. Most institutions (93%) scan in both the supine and prone positions. The median mAs value was 67 mAs (range 20-200), median collimation was 2.5 mm (range 0.75-5). From 1996 until 2004 a significant decrease in mAs and collimation (P=0.006, P<0.0001, respectively) was observed, while institutions that used a multislice scanner increased (P<0.0001). The effective dose remained constant (P=0.76). In 2004 the median effective dose for a complete CT colonography was 10.2 mSv. Despite the increasing use of multislice scanners, which are slightly less dose-efficient, the median effective dose remained approximately constant between 1996 and 2004. This is mainly caused by the use of lower mAs settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1192-202 - PubMed
    1. Br J Radiol. 1998 Jan;71(841):1-3 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):649-57 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1713-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Radiol. 2005 Jan;78(925):8-10 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources