Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;10(1):R11.
doi: 10.1186/cc3955.

The clinical value of daily routine chest radiographs in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit is low

Affiliations

The clinical value of daily routine chest radiographs in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit is low

Marleen E Graat et al. Crit Care. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical value of daily routine chest radiographs (CXRs) in critically ill patients is unknown. We conducted this study to evaluate how frequently unexpected predefined major abnormalities are identified with daily routine CXRs, and how often these findings lead to a change in care for intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Method: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a 28-bed, mixed medical-surgical ICU of a university hospital.

Results: Over a 5-month period, 2,457 daily routine CXRs were done in 754 consecutive ICU patients. The majority of these CXRs did not reveal any new predefined major finding. In only 5.8% of daily routine CXRs (14.3% of patients) was one or more new and unexpected abnormality encountered, including large atelectases (24 times in 20 patients), large infiltrates (23 in 22), severe pulmonary congestion (29 in 25), severe pleural effusion (13 in 13), pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum (14 in 13), and malposition of the orotracheal tube (32 in 26). Fewer than half of the CXRs with a new and unexpected finding were ultimately clinically relevant; in only 2.2% of all daily routine CXRs (6.4% of patients) did these radiologic abnormalities result in a change to therapy. Subgroup analysis revealed no differences between medical and surgical patients with regard to the incidence of new and unexpected findings on daily routine CXRs and the effect of new and unexpected CXR findings on daily care.

Conclusion: In the ICU, daily routine CXRs seldom reveal unexpected, clinically relevant abnormalities, and they rarely prompt action. We propose that this diagnostic examination be abandoned in ICU patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Trotman-Dickenson B. Radiology in the intensive care unit (Part I) J Intensive Care Med. 2003;18:198–210. doi: 10.1177/0885066603251897. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Radiology Routine daily portable X-ray http://www.acr.org/ - PubMed
    1. Bekemeyer WB, Crapo RO, Calhoon S, Cannon CY, Clayton PD. Efficacy of chest radiography in a respiratory intensive care unit. A prospective study. Chest. 1985;88:691–696. - PubMed
    1. Gartenschlager M, Busch H, Kussmann J, Nafe B, Beyermann K, Klose KJ. Radiological thorax monitoring in ventilated intensive care patients [in German] Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1996;164:95–101. - PubMed
    1. Brainsky A, Fletcher RH, Glick HA, Lanken PN, Williams SV, Kundel HL. Routine portable chest radiographs in the medical intensive care unit: effects and costs. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:801–805. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199705000-00015. - DOI - PubMed