Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry
- PMID: 1642152
- DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070714
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry
Abstract
Although single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) has been the predominant tool used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in the forearm, the development of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) provides the benefits of greater source stability, reduced scanning time, and improved image resolution compared to SPA. In the present study we used the DEXA bone densitometer (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA) to (1) measure BMD in the one-third radius and ultradistal radius; (2) examine the reproducibility of these BMD measurements; and (3) compare the BMD at the one-third radius with SPA (SP2, Lunar Corp., Madison, WI). In 65 normal women (ages 22-74 years) we examined changes in the forearm DEXA BMD with age, revealing significant quadratic regression equations. The reproducibility of DEXA BMD (mean +/- SEM) in 7 normal subjects aged 22-50 years is 0.85 +/- 0.16% for the predominantly cortical one-third radius site and 0.97 +/- 0.15% for the more trabecular ultradistal site. The regression relationship between DEXA and SPA of the one-third radius in 26 subjects (ages 22-68 years) is DEXA BMD = 0.105 + 0.826 (SPA BMD); R = 0.97, R2 = 0.94, p less than 0.0001. Bone densitometry of the forearm using DEXA may be performed relatively rapidly, providing reproducibility and image resolution that are generally superior to those observed with SPA.
Similar articles
-
Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for forearm bone mineral density measurements.J Clin Densitom. 2007 Jul-Sep;10(3):306-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 21. J Clin Densitom. 2007. PMID: 17584510
-
Prediction of bone mineral density of lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck and Ward's triangle by forearm bone mineral density.J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Mar;84(3):390-6. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001. PMID: 11460941
-
Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.J Bone Miner Res. 1991 Jul;6(7):681-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650060705. J Bone Miner Res. 1991. PMID: 1950673
-
[Measurements of bone mineral density of lumbar vertebrae in the lateral projection by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--comparison with anteroposterior spinal and radial bone mineral measurements].Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993 Jan;67(1):49-57. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993. PMID: 8454926 Japanese.
-
Artifacts and Incidental Findings Encountered on Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: Atlas and Analysis.Semin Nucl Med. 2015 Sep;45(5):458-69. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.02.001. Semin Nucl Med. 2015. PMID: 26278856 Review.
Cited by
-
Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Mar;54(3):212-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00301681. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994. PMID: 8055369
-
Radial bone density and breast cancer risk in white and African-American women.Osteoporos Int. 2004 Jul;15(7):535-40. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1576-z. Osteoporos Int. 2004. PMID: 14760517
-
Peripheral bone density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;28(10):1141-5. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1211-2. Epub 2009 Jun 16. Clin Rheumatol. 2009. PMID: 19529880
-
Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.Osteoporos Int. 1996;6(5):407-15. doi: 10.1007/BF01623015. Osteoporos Int. 1996. PMID: 8931036
-
Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.Osteoporos Int. 1996;6(3):207-12. doi: 10.1007/BF01622736. Osteoporos Int. 1996. PMID: 8783294
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical