Physicians in retainer ("concierge") practice. A national survey of physician, patient, and practice characteristics
- PMID: 16423094
- PMCID: PMC1490281
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0233.x
Physicians in retainer ("concierge") practice. A national survey of physician, patient, and practice characteristics
Abstract
Background: Retainer practices represent a new model of care whereby physicians charge an up-front fee for services that may not be covered by health insurance. The characteristics of these practices are largely unknown.
Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a cross-sectional mail survey of 144 retainer physicians (58% response rate) and a national random sample of 463 nonretainer physicians (50% response rate) to compare retainer and nonretainer practices. Outcomes of interest included physician demographics, size and case-mix of patient panel, services offered and, for retainer practices, characteristics of practice development.
Results: Retainer physicians have much smaller patient panels (mean 898 vs 2303 patients, P<.0001) than their nonretainer counterparts, and care for fewer African-American (mean 7% vs 16%, P<.002), Hispanic (4% vs 14%, P<.001), or Medicaid (5% vs 15%, P<.001) patients. Physicians in retainer practices are more likely to offer accompanied specialist visits (30% vs 1%), house calls (63% vs 26%), 24-hour direct physician access (91% vs 40%), and several other services (all P values <.05). Most retainer physicians (85%) converted from nonretainer practices but kept few of their former patients (mean 12%). Most retainer physicians (84%) provide charity care and many continue to see some patients (mean 17%) who do not pay retainer fees.
Conclusions: Despite differences between retainer and nonretainer practices, there is also substantial overlap in services provided. These findings, in conjunction with the scope of patient discontinuity when physicians transition to retainer practice, suggest that ethical and legal debates about the standing of these practices will endure.
Comment in
-
Concierge care and the future of general internal medicine.J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Dec;20(12):1190. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00276.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 16423114 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Carey B. A visit with Dr. Delux: red-carpet treatment can be had for a price, but is “boutique” worth it? Los Angeles Times. July 22 2002
-
- Retainer practices. Report of the council on ethical and judicial affairs. American Medical Association. 2004 Report 3-A-03.
-
- Brennan TA. Luxury primary care—market innovation or threat to access. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1165–8. - PubMed
-
- American Society of Concierge Physicians. Available at http://www.concierg.physicians.org Accessed September 27, 2004.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources