Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 May;91(3):F166-8.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.087668. Epub 2006 Jan 20.

Sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomised controlled trial

E M Boyle  1 , Y Freer, Z Khan-Orakzai, M Watkinson, E Wright, J R Ainsworth, N McIntosh
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomised controlled trial

E M Boyle et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 May.

Abstract

Background: Screening is necessary for infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity. Despite local anaesthetic drops, infants find eye examinations distressing, displaying behavioural and physiological changes indicating acute pain. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive sucking reduce pain responses associated with invasive procedures.

Objective: To evaluate the use of oral sucrose and/or pacifier for reducing pain responses during eye examinations.

Methods: Forty infants <32 weeks gestation or <1500 g birth weight, in two neonatal units, were randomised to one of four interventions administered two minutes before their first screening examination: 1 ml sterile water as placebo (group 1, n = 10), 1 ml 33% sucrose solution (group 2, n = 10), 1 ml sterile water with pacifier (group 3, n = 9), or 1 ml 33% sucrose solution with pacifier (group 4, n = 11). Examinations were videotaped. Two observers, blind to the intervention, assessed recordings. Pain responses were scored using the premature infant pain profile (PIPP).

Results: The groups were similar in gestation, birth weight, and age at examination. Mean PIPP scores were 15.3, 14.3, 12.3, and 12.1 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Analysis of variance showed a significant difference in PIPP score between groups (p = 0.023). Infants randomised to pacifiers scored lower than those without pacifiers (p = 0.003). There was no difference between groups receiving sucrose and those receiving water (p = 0.321).

Conclusions: Non-nutritive sucking reduced distress responses in infants undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity. The difference in response was large enough to be detected by a validated assessment tool. No synergistic effect of sucrose and pacifier was apparent in this group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none declared

References

    1. Wheatley C M, Dickinson J L, Mackey D A.et al Retinopathy of prematurity: recent advances in our understanding. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 200287F78–F82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleck B W. Therapy for retinopathy of prematurity. Lancet 1999353166–167. - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Ophthalmologists/British Association of Perinatal Medicine Retinopathy of prematurity: guidelines for screening and treatment. The report of a Joint Working Party of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists and the British Association of Perinatal Medicine. Early Hum Dev 199646239–258. - PubMed
    1. Craig K D, Whitfield M F, Grunau R V.et al Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices. Pain 199352287–299. - PubMed
    1. Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M.et al Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain 199915297–303. - PubMed

Publication types