Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006 Jan;23(1):33-6.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-005-9004-2.

Can dissenting findings regarding the comparative effectiveness of ICSI and IVF be explained by a learning curve?

Duncan Mortimer  1 , Simon French
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Can dissenting findings regarding the comparative effectiveness of ICSI and IVF be explained by a learning curve?

Duncan Mortimer et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether between-trial heterogeneity in relative risk of fertilisation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) compared to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) can be explained by learning or by between-trial variation in patient characteristics.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing fertilisation outcomes for ICSI and IVF (without surgical sperm retrieval). Meta-regressions to identify associations between treatment effect and trial characteristics.

Results: Coefficients on individually significant covariates from the meta-regressions confirm that the ICSI versus IVF treatment effect is increased when patients are "unsuited for IVF" but reduced as semen quality improves and when IVF insemination concentrations are increased. However, the relative risk of fertilisation varies inversely with publication date; contrary to the hypothesised learning effect.

Conclusion: While it is recognised that publication date might proxy for unobserved covariates, the possibility of a learning effect in favour of ICSI is not supported by the meta-regression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hall J, Fishel S. In vitro fertilization for male infertility—when and how. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11(4):711–724. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80008-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Payne D, Flaherty SP, Jeffrey R, Warnes GM, Matthews CD. Successful treatment of severe male factor infertility in 100 consecutive cycles using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(11):2051–2057. - PubMed
    1. Fishel S, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Lisi R, Timson J, Green S, Hall J, Fleming S, Hunter A, Dowell K. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus high insemination concentration (HIC) for human conception in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7(2):169–174. doi: 10.1071/RD9950169. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Armin YM. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the treatment of patients with borderline semen. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(11):2829–2830. - PubMed
    1. Hamberger L, Sjögren A, Lundin K, Söderlund B, Nilsson L, Bergh C. Microfertilization techniques—the Swedish experience. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7(2):263–267. doi: 10.1071/RD9950263. - DOI - PubMed