Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease
- PMID: 16429411
- DOI: 10.1002/ana.20737
Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease
Erratum in
- Ann Neurol. 2006 Dec;60(6):747
Abstract
Objective: Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) exerts potent trophic influence on midbrain dopaminergic neurons. This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to confirm initial clinical benefits observed in a small, open-label trial using intraputamenal (Ipu) infusion of recombinant human GDNF (liatermin).
Methods: Thirty-four PD patients were randomized 1 to 1 to receive bilateral continuous Ipu infusion of liatermin 15 microg/putamen/day or placebo. The primary end point was the change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score in the practically defined off condition at 6 months. Secondary end points included other UPDRS scores, motor tests, dyskinesia ratings, patient diaries, and (18)F-dopa uptake.
Results: At 6 months, mean percentage changes in "off" UPDRS motor score were -10.0% and -4.5% in the liatermin and placebo groups, respectively. This treatment difference was not significant (95% confidence interval, -23.0 to 12.0, p = 0.53). Secondary end point results were similar between the groups. A 32.5% treatment difference favoring liatermin in mean (18)F-dopa influx constant (p = 0.019) was observed. Serious, device-related adverse events required surgical repositioning of catheters in two patients and removal of devices in another. Neutralizing antiliatermin antibodies were detected in three patients (one on-study and two in the open-label extension).
Interpretation: Liatermin did not confer the predetermined level of clinical benefit to patients with PD despite increased (18)F-dopa uptake. It is uncertain whether technical differences between this trial and positive open-label studies contributed in any way this negative outcome.
Comment in
-
GDNF poses troubling questions for doctors, drug maker. Toxicity, negative outcome raise doubts.Ann Neurol. 2006 Mar;59(3):A5-6. doi: 10.1002/ana.20805. Ann Neurol. 2006. PMID: 16489612 No abstract available.
-
Expectations and challenges in the therapeutic use of neurotrophic factors.Ann Neurol. 2006 Mar;59(3):444-7. doi: 10.1002/ana.20794. Ann Neurol. 2006. PMID: 16489617 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
