Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Nov 29;360(1463):2139-48.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1745.

Climate change and food security

Affiliations
Review

Climate change and food security

P J Gregory et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Dynamic interactions between and within the biogeophysical and human environments lead to the production, processing, distribution, preparation and consumption of food, resulting in food systems that underpin food security. Food systems encompass food availability (production, distribution and exchange), food access (affordability, allocation and preference) and food utilization (nutritional and societal values and safety), so that food security is, therefore, diminished when food systems are stressed. Such stresses may be induced by a range of factors in addition to climate change and/or other agents of environmental change (e.g. conflict, HIV/AIDS) and may be particularly severe when these factors act in combination. Urbanization and globalization are causing rapid changes to food systems. Climate change may affect food systems in several ways ranging from direct effects on crop production (e.g. changes in rainfall leading to drought or flooding, or warmer or cooler temperatures leading to changes in the length of growing season), to changes in markets, food prices and supply chain infrastructure. The relative importance of climate change for food security differs between regions. For example, in southern Africa, climate is among the most frequently cited drivers of food insecurity because it acts both as an underlying, ongoing issue and as a short-lived shock. The low ability to cope with shocks and to mitigate long-term stresses means that coping strategies that might be available in other regions are unavailable or inappropriate. In other regions, though, such as parts of the Indo-Gangetic Plain of India, other drivers, such as labour issues and the availability and quality of ground water for irrigation, rank higher than the direct effects of climate change as factors influencing food security. Because of the multiple socio-economic and bio-physical factors affecting food systems and hence food security, the capacity to adapt food systems to reduce their vulnerability to climate change is not uniform. Improved systems of food production, food distribution and economic access may all contribute to food systems adapted to cope with climate change, but in adopting such changes it will be important to ensure that they contribute to sustainability. Agriculture is a major contributor of the greenhouse gases methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), so that regionally derived policies promoting adapted food systems need to mitigate further climate change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The changing nature of key research issues and frequently asked questions at a range of different scales moving from crop production to food security.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The three components of food systems with their main elements shown in italics. (From Ingram et al. 2005.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Components of the food chain in selected OECD countries of Europe indicating the two inverted pyramid structure that relates farmers to consumers. (From Grievink 2003.)
Figure 4
Figure 4
The seven most frequently cited drivers in 49 studies of household-level food insecurity in southern Africa. The numbers in the arrows indicate the number of citations, as a percentage of 555 citations of 33 possible drivers. The drivers shaded in grey were noted as being chronic, while those in white indicate drivers experienced mainly as ‘shocks’. The shaded arrows indicate drivers that acted primarily via reductions in food production, while the white arrows indicate those which acted by restricting access to food. (From Scholes & Biggs 2004.)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Factors determining the vulnerability of food systems to GEC. (From Ingram et al. 2005.)
Figure 6
Figure 6
The distribution of root length with soil depth for the barley genotypes Arabic abiad (white bar) and Beecher (black bar). The distributions are the average for two sites in northern Syria with contrasting soils and rainfall (adapted from Gregory 1989).

References

    1. Adger N. Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev. 1999;27:249–269. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00136-3 - DOI
    1. Aggarwal P.K, Joshi P.K, Ingram J.S.I, Gupta R.K. Adapting food systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains to global environmental change: key information needs to improve policy formulation. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2004;7:487–498. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.07.006 - DOI
    1. Alexandratos N. Wiley; Chichester, UK: 1995. World agriculture: towards 2010 an FAO study.
    1. Amthor J.S. Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration on wheat yield. Field Crops Res. 2001;73:1–34. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00179-4 - DOI
    1. Arntzen, J., Muchero, M.T., & Dube, P. 2004 Global environmental change and food provision in southern Africa: explorations for a possible GECAFS research project in southern Africa. GECAFS southern Africa Planning Workshop, Cape Town, 13–15 September 2004 See www.gecafs.org

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources