Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Jan;6(1):190-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01130.x.

Organ donation decision: comparison of donor and nondonor families

J R Rodrigue  1 , D L Cornell, R J Howard
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Organ donation decision: comparison of donor and nondonor families

J R Rodrigue et al. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Family members continue to play a prominent role in donation decisions at time of death. This study examined the relative influence of donor and next-of-kin factors, requestor characteristics, communication processes and satisfaction with the health care team on the donation decision. Data were gathered via structured telephone interview with 285 next-of-kin of donor-eligible deceased individuals who had been approached by coordinators from one organ procurement organization (OPO) in the southeastern USA from July 2001 to February 2004. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that several variables were associated with the donation decision. Subsequent logistic regression analyses revealed that donation was more likely when the deceased was younger, white (OR = 3.20, CI = 1.3, 5.7) and had made his/her donation intentions known (OR = 4.35, CI = 2.6, 7.3), and when the next-of-kin had more favorable organ donation beliefs (OR = 8.72, CI = 5.2, 14.7), was approached about donation by an OPO coordinator (OR = 3.74, CI = 2.2, 6.4), viewed the requestor as sensitive to their needs (OR = 2.70, CI = 1.6, 4.5) and perceived the timing of the request as optimal (OR = 6.63, CI = 3.6, 12.1) (total regression model, chi square = 133.2, p < 0.001, 92.7% of cases correctly predicted). Findings highlight the need for continued public education efforts to maximize positive beliefs about organ donation, to share and document donation decisions and to improve communication processes among the OPO personnel, hospital staff and prospective donor families.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barr ML, Bourge RC, Orens JB, et al. Thoracic organ transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:934–949. - PubMed
    1. Danovitch GM, Cohen DJ, Weir MR, et al. Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:904–915. - PubMed
    1. Hanto DW, Fishbein TM, Pinson CW, et al. Liver and intestine transplantation: summary analysis, 1994–2003. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:916–933. - PubMed
    1. Harmon WE, McDonald RA, Reyes JD, et al. Pediatric transplantation, 1994–2003. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:887–903. - PubMed
    1. Dew MA, Goycoolea JM, Switzer GE, Allen AS. Quality of life in organ transplantation: effects on adult recipients and their families. In: Trzepacz PT, DiMartini AF, editors. The Transplant Patient: Biological, Psychiatric and Ethical Issues in Organ Transplantation. Cambridge University Press; New York: 2000. pp. 67–145.

Publication types