Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;15(1):26-9.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011569.

Are comprehensive environmental changes as effective as health education for smoking cessation?

Affiliations

Are comprehensive environmental changes as effective as health education for smoking cessation?

T Kadowaki et al. Tob Control. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of health education on smoking cessation for all smokers regardless of their willingness to quit smoking and cumulative environmental changes including designation of smoking places, legislation, and price rise.

Design: Comparison of smoking cessation rates over two time periods: the period of health education on smoking cessation (1997-1999), and the period of cumulative environmental changes (2002-2004).

Setting: An occupational setting in a radiator manufacturing factory in Japan.

Subjects: All habitual male smokers who remained in the worksite through the pertinent time period (n = 202 in the period of health education and n = 170 in the period of environmental changes).

Main outcome measurements: Smoking cessation rates at the end of each time period.

Results: The smoking cessation rates over the periods of health education and environmental changes were 8.9% and 7.1%, respectively. There was no difference between these two proportions in a chi2 test (p = 0.513). The age adjustment did not significantly alter the cessation rate.

Conclusions: Cumulative environmental changes are fairly effective in promoting smoking cessation, and may yield similar smoking cessation rates as a health education intervention reaching all smokers regardless of their willingness to quit smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We do not have any competing interest regarding this study.

References

    1. World Health Organization The World Health Report 2002. Geneva: WHO, 2002
    1. World Health Organization Tools for advancing tobacco control in the XXIst century: policy recommendations for smoking cessation and treatment of tobacco dependence, tools for public health. Geneva: WHO, 2003
    1. Parrott S, Godfrey C, Raw M.et al Guidance for commissioners on the cost‐effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions. Thorax 199853S1–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manske S, Miller S, Moyer C.et al Best practice in group‐based smoking cessation: results of a literature review applying effectiveness, plausibility, and practicality criteria. Am J Health Promot 200418409–423. - PubMed
    1. Kadowaki T, Watanabe M, Okayama A.et al Effectiveness of smoking‐cessation intervention in all of the smokers at a worksite in Japan. Ind Health 200038396–403. - PubMed