Rapid brain discrimination of sounds of objects
- PMID: 16436617
- PMCID: PMC6674563
- DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4511-05.2006
Rapid brain discrimination of sounds of objects
Abstract
Electrical neuroimaging in humans identified the speed and spatiotemporal brain mechanism whereby sounds of living and man-made objects are discriminated. Subjects performed an "oddball" target detection task, selectively responding to sounds of either living or man-made objects on alternating blocks, which were controlled for in their spectrogram and harmonics-to-noise ratios between categories. Analyses were conducted on 64-channel auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) from nontarget trials. Comparing responses to sounds of living versus man-made objects, these analyses tested for modulations in local AEP waveforms, global response strength, and the topography of the electric field at the scalp. In addition, the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse solution was applied to periods of observed modulations. Just 70 ms after stimulus onset, a common network of brain regions within the auditory "what" processing stream responded more strongly to sounds of man-made versus living objects, with differential activity within the right temporal and left inferior frontal cortices. Over the 155-257 ms period, the duration of activity of a brain network, including bilateral temporal and premotor cortices, differed between categories of sounds. Responses to sounds of living objects peaked approximately 12 ms later and the activity of the brain network active over this period was prolonged relative to that in response to sounds of man-made objects. The earliest task-related effects were observed at approximately 100 ms poststimulus onset, placing an upper limit on the speed of cortical auditory object discrimination. These results provide critical temporal constraints on human auditory object recognition and semantic discrimination processes.
Figures





Similar articles
-
A temporal hierarchy for conspecific vocalization discrimination in humans.J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 18;30(33):11210-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2239-10.2010. J Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20720129 Free PMC article.
-
Segregated processing of auditory motion and auditory location: an ERP mapping study.Neuroimage. 2002 May;16(1):76-88. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1062. Neuroimage. 2002. PMID: 11969319 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of actions in auditory object discrimination.Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 1;48(2):475-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.041. Epub 2009 Jun 24. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID: 19559091
-
Stimulus-dependent activations and attention-related modulations in the auditory cortex: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.Hear Res. 2014 Jan;307:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 11. Hear Res. 2014. PMID: 23938208 Review.
-
Auditory object perception: A neurobiological model and prospective review.Neuropsychologia. 2017 Oct;105:223-242. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.034. Epub 2017 Apr 30. Neuropsychologia. 2017. PMID: 28467888 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Neuronal mechanisms of voice control are affected by implicit expectancy of externally triggered perturbations in auditory feedback.PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041216. Epub 2012 Jul 17. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22815974 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlea to categories: The spatiotemporal dynamics of semantic auditory representations.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2021 Oct-Dec;38(7-8):468-489. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2022.2085085. Epub 2022 Jun 21. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2021. PMID: 35729704 Free PMC article.
-
Brain mechanisms involved in angry prosody change detection in school-age children and adults, revealed by electrophysiology.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Aug;18(4):748-763. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0602-8. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29736682
-
Selective Enhancement of Object Representations through Multisensory Integration.J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 15;40(29):5604-5615. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2139-19.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 4. J Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32499378 Free PMC article.
-
How learning to abstract shapes neural sound representations.Front Neurosci. 2014 Jun 3;8:132. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00132. eCollection 2014. Front Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24917783 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Arnott SR, Binns MA, Grady CL, Alain C (2004). Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans. NeuroImage 22:401–408. - PubMed
-
- Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Lafaille P, Ahad P, Pike B (2000). Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature 403:309–312. - PubMed
-
- Belin P, Fecteau S, Bedard C (2004). Thinking the voice: neural correlates of voice perception. Trends Cogn Sci 8:129–135. - PubMed
-
- Bergerbest D, Ghahremani DG, Gabrieli JDE (2004). Neural correlates of auditory repetition priming: reduced fMRI activation in the auditory cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 16:966–977. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources