Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;50(2):654-7.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.654-657.2006.

Linezolid in prophylaxis against experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis

Affiliations

Linezolid in prophylaxis against experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis

George Athanassopoulos et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

There are no experimental studies regarding the prophylactic efficacy of linezolid against infective endocarditis. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis of the aortic valve was induced in rabbits by the insertion of a polyethylene catheter. Twenty-four hours later, animals were randomly assigned to a control group, and groups receiving either ampicillin (two doses of 40 mg/kg of body weight each, given intravenously, 2 h apart) or linezolid (a single per os dose of 75 mg/kg). The first dose of ampicillin and the single dose of linezolid were administered 0.5 and 1 h, respectively, prior to the intravenous inoculation of approximately 10(7) CFU of Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis. Linezolid peak levels in rabbit serum were similar to the peak serum levels in humans following a 600-mg oral dose of linezolid. Linezolid prevented endocarditis in 87% of S. oralis-challenged rabbits (P < 0.001 versus controls; P = 0.026 versus ampicillin). In rabbits challenged with E. faecalis, linezolid prevented endocarditis in 73% (P = 0.003 versus controls; P = 0.049 versus ampicillin). Ampicillin prevented endocarditis due to S. oralis or due to E. faecalis in 47% (P = 0.005 versus controls) and in 30% (P = not significant versus controls) of the challenged animals, respectively. In conclusion, linezolid was effective as prophylaxis against endocarditis caused by a strain of S. oralis and to a lesser degree against that caused by a strain of E. faecalis. Its prophylactic efficacy was superior to that of ampicillin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Mean concentrations of linezolid in rabbit serum over time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bayer, A. S., and J. Tu. 1990. Chemoprophylactic efficacy against experimental endocarditis caused by β-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci is associated with prolonged serum inhibitory activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1068-1074. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brauers, J., M. Kresken, D. Hafner, P. M. Shah, and the German Linezolid Resistance Study Group. 2005. Surveillance of linezolid resistance in Germany, 2001-2002. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:39-46. - PubMed
    1. Buchanan, L. V., C. F. Dailey, R. J. LeMay, R. J. Zielinski, M. S. Τ. Kuo, and J. K. Gibson. 2002. Time-dependent antibacterial effects of linezolid in experimental rabbit endocarditis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:440-442. - PubMed
    1. Chiang, F. Y., and M. Climo. 2003. Efficacy of linezolid alone or in combination with vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3002-3004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dailey, C. F., C. L. Dileto-Fang, L. V. Buchanan, Μ. Ρ. Oramas-Shirey, D. H. Batts, C. W. Ford, and J. K. Gibson. 2001. Efficacy of linezolid in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2304-2308. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms