Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;20(4):580-2.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0405-1. Epub 2006 Jan 25.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: a pilot study

Affiliations

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: a pilot study

G Tzovaras et al. Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Regional anesthesia has not been used as the sole anesthetic procedure other than in the scenario of a patient at high risk to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum under general anesthesia.

Methods: Fifteen ASA grade I or II patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative parameters, postoperative pain and recovery in general, as well as patient satisfaction at follow-up were prospectively recorded in a pilot study to assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure.

Results: All operations were completed laparoscopically and conversion from spinal to general anesthesia was not required in any of the cases. Median pain score 4 h postoperatively was 1.5 (range, 0-5), at 8 h it was 1 (range, 0-6), and at 24 h it was 1 (range, 0-4). All patients were discharged after 24 h. Follow-up 2 weeks postoperatively showed all but one patient to be satisfied and strongly recommending the anesthetic procedure.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum can be successfully and safely performed under spinal anesthesia. Furthermore, it seems that spinal anesthesia is associated with minimal postoperative pain and at least an equally good recovery as with general anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Anesth. 1998 Nov;10(7):546-50 - PubMed
    1. Adv Perit Dial. 1998;14:83-6 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1992 Aug;127(8):917-21; discussion 921-3 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):472-5 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1998 Aug;12(8):1082-4 - PubMed