Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant
- PMID: 16441792
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01211.x
Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant
Abstract
To determine an adequate placement torque for obtaining a better success rate of mini-implants that are screwed into the buccal alveolar bone of the posterior region as an anchor for orthodontic treatment, implant placement torque (IPT) was measured. The subjects were 41 orthodontic patients (124 implants), with an average age of 24.9 years (SD 6.5 years), who had surgery to place titanium mini-implants. The peak value of IPT was measured using a torque screwdriver. The success rate of the mini-implant anchor for 124 implants was 85.5%. The mean IPT ranged from 7.2 to 13.5 N cm, depending on the location of the implants. There was a significant difference in the IPT between maxilla and mandible. The IPT in the mandible was, unexpectedly, significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group. Therefore, a large IPT should not be used always. According to our calculations of the risk ratio for failure, to raise the success rate of 1.6-mm diameter mini-implants, the recommended IPT is within the range from 5 to 10 N cm.
Similar articles
-
Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.019. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20451776
-
Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;36(8):695-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.009. Epub 2007 May 22. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17521887
-
Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1595-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19615569
-
Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):825-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.038. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20685539 Review.
-
Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants.J Oral Sci. 2011 Dec;53(4):407-12. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.53.407. J Oral Sci. 2011. PMID: 22167023 Review.
Cited by
-
Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode - an ex vivo study.Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Sep 3;6(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00245-3. Int J Implant Dent. 2020. PMID: 32880030 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal asymmetric thread for orthodontic microimplants: Laboratory and clinical evaluation.Angle Orthod. 2015 Jul;85(4):585-90. doi: 10.2319/050314-320.1. Epub 2014 Oct 6. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25286340 Free PMC article.
-
Drilling Capability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: In Vitro Study.Dent J (Basel). 2020 Dec 21;8(4):138. doi: 10.3390/dj8040138. Dent J (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33371233 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Dec;28(12):673-8. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.04.037. Epub 2012 Jul 28. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 23217360 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo degradation of orthodontic miniscrew implants: surface analysis of as-received and retrieved specimens.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015 Feb;26(2):71. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5405-7. Epub 2015 Jan 29. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015. PMID: 25631268
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources