'Choose and Book' in ENT: the GP perspective
- PMID: 16441973
- DOI: 10.1017/S0022215106000132
'Choose and Book' in ENT: the GP perspective
Abstract
Objectives: 'Choose and Book' is a UK government initiative devised to allow a greater freedom of choice for National Health Service patients. The system is designed to give patients a choice of hospitals and appointment times, as well as giving their general practitioner (GP) more responsibility for appropriate prioritization. We set out to determine the attitudes of UK GPs to the new Choose and Book project and to assess the impact that these changes are likely to have on ENT practice.
Design: Postal questionnaire survey.
Methods: Five hundred GPs were sent a questionnaire about the planned Choose and Book referral project.
Results: Three hundred and eighty GPs (76 per cent) replied to the questionnaire after reminders were sent. Most were aware of the project and had been sent information about it. Of those who had heard of it, 61.5 per cent did not think it was a good thing. Most stated that both they and their patients were satisfied with current prioritization practices. Many GPs would be willing to delegate responsibility for prioritization to non-clinical staff. Important time and responsibility issues were identified.
Conclusions: The majority of GPs were not in favour of Choose and Book. Many cited difficulties with time constraints and an inflexible system as factors that made Choose and Book unacceptable.
Similar articles
-
The National Programme for IT in England: clinicians' views on the impact of the Choose and Book service.Health Informatics J. 2009 Sep;15(3):167-78. doi: 10.1177/1460458209337423. Health Informatics J. 2009. PMID: 19713392
-
GP non-principals in north-east Scotland--a valuable pool of medical labour or second-class citizens? Results of a questionnaire survey.Health Bull (Edinb). 1999 Sep;57(5):344-51. Health Bull (Edinb). 1999. PMID: 12811882
-
Evaluation of advanced access in the national primary care collaborative.Br J Gen Pract. 2004 May;54(502):334-40. Br J Gen Pract. 2004. PMID: 15113514 Free PMC article.
-
Choosing and using: patient choice in 'Choose and Book'.Br J Community Nurs. 2007 Dec;12(12):558-62. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2007.12.12.27742. Br J Community Nurs. 2007. PMID: 18361168 Review.
-
Choose and Book.Clin Med (Lond). 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):473-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-5-473. Clin Med (Lond). 2006. PMID: 17080895 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study.Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 19;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6. Implement Sci. 2011. PMID: 21244714 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the referral preferences and consultation requests of primary care physicians with otolaryngology - head and neck surgery.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec 29;44:57. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0114-2. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015. PMID: 26714893 Free PMC article.
-
The new general practice contract and reform of primary care in the United kingdom.Healthc Policy. 2007 May;2(4):34-48. Healthc Policy. 2007. PMID: 19305731 Free PMC article.
-
Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients' experience of outpatient appointment booking.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Aug 1;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-36. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008. PMID: 18673533 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous