Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Feb;32(2):216-23.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32040.x.

Calculating the pressure and the stiffness in three different categories of class II medical elastic compression stockings

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Calculating the pressure and the stiffness in three different categories of class II medical elastic compression stockings

Karin van der Wegen-Franken et al. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Medical elastic compression stockings (MECSs) are currently classified according to the pressure they exert at the ankle at the point of its minimum girth (B level). Despite this classification, there are considerable differences between MECSs belonging to the same compression class from the same manufacturers and between different manufacturers. This makes it difficult for the clinician to choose the most suitable MECS for the patient. The stiffness may be used to distinguish between MECSs of different brands.

Objective: To calculate the pressure and the stiffness at the B level in three categories of class II MECSs from nine different brands.

Methods: Nine different brands of class II MECSs that were divided into three categories (flat-knitted custom-made, classic round-knitted ready-made, and modern (ultrathin) round-knitted ready-made) were tested. The tension of the textile of the MECSs was measured with the Instron tester (Instron International Ltd., Edegem, Belgium). The pressures and stiffness at the B level were calculated.

Results: The pressures exerted by flat-knitted custom-made MECSs were higher than those exerted by the ready-made round-knitted MECSs. Surprisingly, the former showed higher pressures than those published by the European Committee for Standardization. A wide range of stiffness was observed within the different brands and within the three different categories of MECS.

Conclusion: Despite their assignment to compression class II, all nine brands of MECSs that were tested had widely ranging stiffness. This would indicate that the stiffness is an additional important characteristic for distinguishing between MECSs from different brands, which should be taken into account by the clinician in selecting the most suitable MECSs for the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources