Similar articles

• Combining magnetoencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

  Mathiak K, Fallgatter AJ. Mathiak K, et al. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;68:121-48. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)68005-1. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005. PMID: 16443012 Review. No abstract available.
• Fetal magnetoencephalography: viewing the developing brain in utero.

  Preissl H, Lowery CL, Eswaran H. Preissl H, et al. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;68:1-23. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)68001-4. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005. PMID: 16443008 Review. No abstract available.
• How are evoked responses generated? The need for a unified mathematical framework.

  de Munck JC, Bijma F. de Munck JC, et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;121(2):127-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010. PMID: 19903590 No abstract available.
• MEG in paediatrics: introduction to the special issue.

  Taylor M. Taylor M. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008 May;68(2):83-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Feb 2. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008. PMID: 18328586 No abstract available.
• Comparison of artifact correction methods for infant EEG applied to extraction of event-related potential signals.

  Fujioka T, Mourad N, He C, Trainor LJ. Fujioka T, et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Jan;122(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.036. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011. PMID: 20580601