Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;3(2):189-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.11.007.

Characterization of the infarct substrate and ventricular tachycardia circuits with noncontact unipolar mapping in a porcine model of myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Characterization of the infarct substrate and ventricular tachycardia circuits with noncontact unipolar mapping in a porcine model of myocardial infarction

Jason T Jacobson et al. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Conventional mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction is limited in patients with hemodynamically untolerated or noninducible VT.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop a unique strategy using noncontact unipolar mapping to define infarct substrate and VT circuits.

Methods: Dynamic substrate mapping (DSM) was performed in seven pigs with healed anterior myocardial infarction. This technique defined substrate as the intersection of low-voltage areas identified in sinus rhythm and during pacing around the infarct. Pacing was also performed within the substrate to determine exit sites.

Results: Anteroapical transmural scar was identified in all animals. A mean of three pacing sites was used for substrate definition. The mean area (+/- SD) was 18.4 +/- 8.8 cm2 by DSM and 15.4 +/- 6.9 cm2 by pathology (P >.5). A mean of 4.5 sites was paced within substrate. Ten of 18 paced wavefronts exited substrate adjacent to the pacing area, seven exited at distant areas, and one had two exits. VT was induced in five animals (1.6 morphologies per animal). Except for one VT, circuit exit sites were identified at substrate borders on the endocardium. VT exit sites were at (n = 6) or near (n = 3) a pacing exit site. Electrogram voltages differed significantly between substrate, border, and nonsubstrate areas in infarcted animals and in comparison with control animals. No substrate was identified in two control animals.

Conclusion: DSM is a reliable method for infarct substrate localization in this model. Pacing within substrate can predict VT exit sites and may prove useful for ablation of unmappable VT after myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources