Stimulating debate: ethics in a multidisciplinary functional neurosurgery committee
- PMID: 16446416
- PMCID: PMC2563325
- DOI: 10.1136/jme.200X.013151
Stimulating debate: ethics in a multidisciplinary functional neurosurgery committee
Abstract
Multidisciplinary healthcare committees meet regularly to discuss patients' candidacy for emerging functional neurosurgical procedures, such as Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). Through debate and discussion around the surgical candidacy of particular patients, functional neurosurgery programs begin to mold practice and policy supported both by scientific evidence and clear value choices. These neurosurgical decisions have special considerations not found in non-neurologic committees. The professional time used to resolve these conflicts provides opportunities for the emergence of careful, ethical practices simultaneous with the expansion of therapy applications.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: none declared
References
-
- Wright L, Ross K. Daar AS. The Roles of a Bioethicist on an Organ Transplantation Service. Amer J Trans 20055821–826. - PubMed
-
- Simon C M. Images and Image: technology and the social politics of revealing disorder in a North American hospital. Med Anthropol Q 199913141–162. - PubMed
-
- Ogden‐Epker M, Cullum C M. Quantitative and qualitative interpretations of neuropsychological data in the assessment of temporal lobectomy candidates. Clin Neuropsychol 200115183–195. - PubMed
-
- Sanghera M K, Desaloms J M, Stewart R M. High‐frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson's disease—a team perspective. J Neurosci Nurs 200436301–311. - PubMed
-
- Ford P J, Henderson J. Neuroethics in the operating room: functional neurosurgical interventions. In: Illes J, ed. Neuroethics in the 21st century: defining the issues in theory, practice and policy . New York: Oxford University Press, 2005,213–228.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources