The rate of adenocarcinoma in endoscopically removed colorectal polyps
- PMID: 16447472
The rate of adenocarcinoma in endoscopically removed colorectal polyps
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of cancer in a modern series of colorectal polyps. All pathology reports from colon and rectal polyps from 1999 to 2002 were reviewed. Reports of bowel resections, cancer-free polyps, and polyp-free mucosal biopsies were excluded. Polyps were grouped by size, and the rate of adenocarcinoma was determined. x2 was used for analysis. A total of 4,443 polyps were found, of which 3,225 were adenomatous [2,883 (89.4%) tubular adenomas, 399 (9.3%) tubulo-villous adenomas, 32 (1.0%) villous adenomas, and 11 (0.3%) carcinomas]. The rate of adenocarcinoma by size was 0.07 per cent for polyps <1 cm, 2.41 per cent for polyps 1-2 cm, and 19.35 per cent for polyps >2 cm, representing significantly fewer cancers for each category of polyp size than the accepted standard. The rate of carcinoma in colon polyps is much lower than previously thought and currently stated in many texts. These data do not alter the recommendations for polyp removal, however, failure to retrieve a specimen in a polyp <1 cm in size is unlikely to have an adverse outcome because the chances of malignancy are very low.
Similar articles
-
Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important?Eur J Surg. 2001 Oct;167(10):777-81. doi: 10.1080/11024150152707770. Eur J Surg. 2001. PMID: 11775731
-
Pathological characterization of colorectal polyps in Ilorin, Nigeria.Afr J Med Med Sci. 2010 Sep;39(3):215-9. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2010. PMID: 21416791
-
Serrated adenoma of the colon: an under-recognized premalignant variant of adenomatous polyp.Am Surg. 2010 Sep;76(9):E190-2. Am Surg. 2010. PMID: 21396285 No abstract available.
-
Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence.Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S73-86. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999. PMID: 10772421 Review.
-
[Colorectal cancer: study on 365 cases].Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1996 Sep-Dec;16(3):187-96. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1996. PMID: 12165782 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2010 Mar 1;4(2):159-169. doi: 10.1517/17530051003658736. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2010. PMID: 20473367 Free PMC article.
-
Polyp Resection - Controversial Practices and Unanswered Questions.Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 9;8(3):e76. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.6. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28277492 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps.Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 21;14(4):532. doi: 10.3390/life14040532. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672802 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Assessment of Local Resectability of Colorectal Malignancies.Visc Med. 2024 Jun;40(3):110-115. doi: 10.1159/000538317. Epub 2024 Apr 22. Visc Med. 2024. PMID: 38873626 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Colonic polyp histopathology and location in a community-based sample of older adults.BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 2;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0497-1. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27485715 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical