Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Nov-Dec;41(10):325-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11626-005-0003-5.

Selection of a standard culture medium for primary culture of limulus polyphemus amebocytes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Selection of a standard culture medium for primary culture of limulus polyphemus amebocytes

Lenka V Hurton et al. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2005 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

This study provides information relevant to future research aimed at producing Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) in vitro, which would potentially reduce the need to harvest and bleed horseshoe crabs as in the current methods of LAL production. To address the need for primary culture of horseshoe crab amebocytes, this study tested the effects of a variety of standard insect cell culture media on amebocyte morphology and viability after 7 d of maintenance. Amebocyte morphology was least altered from in vivo form in Grace's Modified Insect Medium, with no observed degranulation of cells, as compared to the other media tested. There were significant differences in amebocyte viability among the six insect cell culture media tested. Grace's Modified Insect Medium sustained viability of 77.2 +/- 5.1% (mean +/- standard deviation) of amebocytes, followed distantly by Grace's Insect Medium with 35.1 +/- 8.7% amebocyte viability. Results indicate that Grace's Modified Insect Medium with horseshoe crab serum supplementation was the best candidate of the six media tested for future medium optimization for Limulus amebocyte requirements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cytobios. 1988;55(222-223):147-54 - PubMed
    1. Trends Biotechnol. 2001 Aug;19(8):277-81 - PubMed
    1. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1964 Sep;115:265-74 - PubMed
    1. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 1989 Sep;5(9):516-21 - PubMed
    1. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1992 Mar;28A(3 Pt 1):215-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources