Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2006 Jan 31:7:8.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-8.

Sagittal jaw position in relation to body posture in adult humans--a rasterstereographic study

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Sagittal jaw position in relation to body posture in adult humans--a rasterstereographic study

Carsten Lippold et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The correlations between the sagittal jaw position and the cranio-cervical inclination are described in literature. Only few studies focus on the sagittal jaw position and the body posture using valid and objective orthopaedic examination methods. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with malocclusions reveal significant differences in body posture compared to those without (upper thoracic inclination, kyphotic angle, lordotic angle and lower lumbar inclination).

Methods: Eighty-four healthy adult patients (with a mean age = 25.6 years and ranging from 16.1 to 55.8 years) were examined with informed consent. The orthodontic examination horizontal overjet (distance between upper and lower incisors) was determined by using an orthodontic digital sliding calliper. The subjects were subdivided in respect of the overjet with the following results: 18 revealed a normal overjet (Class I), 38 had an increased overjet (Class II) and 28 had an reversed overjet (Class III). Rasterstereography was used to carry out a three-dimensional back shape analysis. This method is based on photogrammetry. A three-dimensional shape was produced by analysing the distortion of parallel horizontal white light lines projected on the patient's back, followed by mathematical modelling. On the basis of the sagittal profile the upper thoracic inclination, the thoracic angle, the lordotic angle and the pelvic inclination were determined with a reported accuracy of 2.8 degrees and the correlations to the sagittal jaw position were calculated by means of ANOVA, Scheffé and Kruskal-Wallis procedures.

Results: Between the different overjet groups, no statistically significant differences or correlations regarding the analysed back shape parameters could be obtained. However, comparing males and females there were statistically significant differences in view of the parameters 'lordotic angle' and 'pelvic inclination'.

Conclusion: No correlations between overjet and variables of the thoracic, lordotic or the pelvic inclination could be observed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lateral Profile Analysis derived from Rasterestereographic data. Outline of the sagittal profile. Three inflectional points along the profile are marked by open circles – the cervicothoracic (ICT), the thoracolumbar (ITL) and the lumbo-sacral inflection point (ILS). The tangents to the inflectional points span two characteristic angles of the profile – the kyphotic angle (KA) is spanned by the tangent lines in ICT and ITL; in an analogous way the lordotic angle (LA) is spanned by the tangents in ITL and ILS. Two other angles provide orientation data with respect to the vertical line (plumb line); 1) the angle of the upper thoracic inclination (UTI), which is virtually the angle spanned by the vertical and the ICT tangent, 2) the angle of the pelvic inclination (PI), virtually the angle spanned by the vertical and the tangent ILS

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Korbmacher H, Eggers-Stroeder G, Koch L, Kahl-Nieke B. Correlations between anomalies of the dentition and pathologies of the locomotor system- a literature review. J Orofac Orthop. 2004;65:190–203. doi: 10.1007/s00056-004-0305-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Michelotti A, Manzo P, Farella M, Martina R. Occlusion and posture: is there evidence of correlation? Minerva Stomatol. 1999;48:525–534. - PubMed
    1. Solow B, Sandham A. Cranio-cervical posture: a factor in the development and function of the dentofacial structures. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:447–456. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.5.447. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solow B, Siersback-Nielsen S. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:449–458. - PubMed
    1. Solow B, Tallgren A. Head posture and craniofacial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1976;44:417–436. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330440306. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types