Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S85.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S85.

Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium and its effect on non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis using two high density single-nucleotide polymorphism mapping panels

Affiliations

Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium and its effect on non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis using two high density single-nucleotide polymorphism mapping panels

Sarah Shaw Murray. BMC Genet. .

Abstract

Genotype data from the Illumina Linkage III SNP panel (n = 4,720 SNPs) and the Affymetrix 10 k mapping array (n = 11,120 SNPs) were used to test the effects of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs in a linkage analysis in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism pedigree collection (143 pedigrees; 1,614 individuals). The average r2 between adjacent markers across the genetic map was 0.099 +/- 0.003 in the Illumina III panel and 0.17 +/- 0.003 in the Affymetrix 10 k array. In order to determine the effect of LD between marker loci in a nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis, markers in strong LD with another marker (r2 > 0.40) were removed (n = 471 loci in the Illumina panel; n = 1,804 loci in the Affymetrix panel) and the linkage analysis results were compared to the results using the entire marker sets. In all analyses using the ALDX1 phenotype, 8 linkage regions on 5 chromosomes (2, 7, 10, 11, X) were detected (peak markers p < 0.01), and the Illumina panel detected an additional region on chromosome 6. Analysis of the same pedigree set and ALDX1 phenotype using short tandem repeat markers (STRs) resulted in 3 linkage regions on 3 chromosomes (peak markers p < 0.01). These results suggest that in this pedigree set, LD between loci with spacing similar to the SNP panels tested may not significantly affect the overall detection of linkage regions in a genome scan. Moreover, since the data quality and information content are greatly improved in the SNP panels over STR genotyping methods, new linkage regions may be identified due to higher information content and data quality in a dense SNP linkage panel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
LD strength in the Illumina Linkage III SNP panel (ILMN) and the Affymetrix 10 k mapping array (AFFY). a) Distribution of marker pairs by LD strength (r2); b) Proportion of marker pairs r2 > 0.4 by chromosome (chromosome 23 = X chromosome).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multipoint NPL analysis of ALDX1 phenotype using the Illumina III SNP linkage panel. Multipoint NPL scores across the entire chromosome for all SNPs (blue line) and a subset of SNPs with weak or no LD (orange line) are shown for the six chromosomes that have regions with corresponding p-values < 0.01. In addition, the information content (IC) curves are also shown for all loci (green line) and the subset of SNPs with weak or no LD (pink line).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multipoint NPL analysis of ALDX1 phenotype using the Affymetrix 10 k Mapping Array. Multipoint NPL scores across the entire chromosome for all SNPs (blue line) and a subset of SNPs with weak or no LD (orange line) are shown for six chromosomes. Chromosomes 2, 7, 10, 11, and X have regions with corresponding p-values < 0.01; chromosome 6 is shown for comparison with the Illumina SNP mapping panel results. In addition, the information content (IC) curves are also shown for all loci (green line) and the subset of SNPs with weak or no LD (pink line).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gyapay G, Morissette J, Vignal A, Dib C, Fizames C, Millasseau P, Marc S, Bernardi G, Lathrop M, Weissenbach J. The 1993–94 Genethon human genetic linkage map. Nat Genet. 1994;7:246–339. doi: 10.1038/ng0694supp-246. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray JC, Buetow KH, Weber JL, Ludwigsen S, Scherpbierheddema T, Manion F, Quillen J, Sheffield VC, Sunden S, Duyk GM, Weissenbach J, Gyapay G, Dib C, Morrissette J, Lathrop GM, Vignal A, White R, Matsunami N, Gerken S, Melis R, Albertsen H, Plaetke R, Odelberg S, Ward D, Dausset J, Cohen D, Cann H. A comprehensive human linkage map with centimorgan density. Cooperative Human Linkage Center (CHLC) Science. 1994;265:2049–2054. doi: 10.1126/science.8091227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dib C, Faure S, Fizames C, Samson D, Drouot N, Vignal A, Millasseau P, Marc S, Hazan J, Seboun E. A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites. Nature. 1996;380:152–154. doi: 10.1038/380152a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broman KW, Murray JC, Sheffield VC, White RL, Weber JL. Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:861–869. doi: 10.1086/302011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Richardsson B, Sigurdardottir S, Barnard J, Hallbeck B, Masson G, Shlien A, Palsson ST, Frigge ML, Thorgeirsson TE, Gulcher JR, Stefansson K. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2002;31:241–247. - PubMed

Substances